mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Thyroid Nodule Segmentation in Ultrasound

arXiv 2602.21452 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: Deep learning-based segmentation models are increasingly integrated into clinical imaging workflows, yet their robustness to adversarial perturbations remains incompletely characterized, particularly for ultrasound images. We evaluated adversarial attacks and inference-time defenses for thyroid nodule segmentation in B-mode ultrasound. Methods: Two black-box adversarial attacks were developed: (1) Structured Speckle Amplification Attack (SSAA), which injects boundary-targeted noise, and (2) Frequency-Domain Ultrasound Attack (FDUA), which applies bandpass-filtered phase perturbations in the Fourier domain. Three inference-time mitigations were evaluated on adversarial images: randomized preprocessing with test-time augmentation, deterministic input denoising, and stochastic ensemble inference with consistency-aware aggregation. Experiments were conducted on a U-Net segmentation model trained on cine-clips from a database of 192 thyroid nodules. Results: The baseline model achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.76 (SD 0.20) on unperturbed images. SSAA reduced DSC by 0.29 (SD 0.20) while maintaining high visual similarity (SSIM = 0.94). FDUA resulted in a smaller DSC reduction of 0.11 (SD 0.09) with lower visual fidelity (SSIM = 0.82). Against SSAA, all three defenses significantly improved DSC after correction, with deterministic denoising showing the largest recovery (+0.10, p < 0.001), followed by randomized preprocessing (+0.09, p < 0.001), and stochastic ensemble inference (+0.08, p = 0.002). No defense achieved statistically significant improvement against FDUA. Conclusion: Spatial-domain adversarial perturbations in ultrasound segmentation showed partial mitigation with input preprocessing, whereas frequency-domain perturbations were not mitigated by the defenses, highlighting modality-specific challenges in adversarial robustness evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  3. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 306
  4. 2019Transfer of Adversarial Robustness Between Perturbation Typescited by 25
  5. 2018Generalizability vs. Robustness: Adversarial Examples for Medical Imagingcited by 23
  6. 2023Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 14
  7. 2025Speckle2Self: Self-Supervised Ultrasound Speckle Reduction Without Clean Datacited by 9
  8. 2020Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation: A 3D Deep Coarse-to-fine Framework and Its Adversarial Examplescited by 5
  9. 2026Synthetic Data Augmentation for Medical Audio Classification: A Preliminary Evaluationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.