Extending μP: Spectral Conditions for Feature Learning Across Optimizers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several variations of adaptive first-order and second-order optimization methods have been proposed to accelerate and scale the training of large language models. The performance of these optimization routines is highly sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters (HPs), which are computationally expensive to tune for large-scale models. Maximal update parameterization (μP) is a set of scaling rules which aims to make the optimal HPs independent of the model size, thereby allowing the HPs tuned on a smaller (computationally cheaper) model to be transferred to train a larger, target model. Despite promising results for SGD and Adam, deriving μP for other optimizers is challenging because the underlying tensor programming approach is difficult to grasp. Building on recent work that introduced spectral conditions as an alternative to tensor programs, we propose a novel framework to derive μP for a broader class of optimizers, including AdamW, ADOPT, LAMB, Sophia, Shampoo and Muon. We implement our μP derivations on multiple benchmark models and demonstrate zero-shot learning rate transfer across increasing model width for the above optimizers. Further, we provide empirical insights into depth-scaling parameterization for these optimizers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 671
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
- 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 278
- 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 268
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 260
- 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 182
7 more
- 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 101
- 2023Tensor Programs VI: Feature Learning in Infinite-Depth Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 69
- 2024u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrizationcited by 29
- 2024ADOPT: Modified Adam Can Converge with Any β2 with the Optimal Ratecited by 18
- 2023On the Parameterization of Second-Order Optimization Effective Towards the Infinite Widthcited by 14
- 2024μLO: Compute-Efficient Meta-Generalization of Learned Optimizerscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.