On Electric Vehicle Energy Demand Forecasting and the Effect of Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The wide spread of new energy resources, smart devices, and demand side management strategies has motivated several analytics operations, from infrastructure load modeling to user behavior profiling. Energy Demand Forecasting (EDF) of Electric Vehicle Supply Equipments (EVSEs) is one of the most critical operations for ensuring efficient energy management and sustainability, since it enables utility providers to anticipate energy/power demand, optimize resource allocation, and implement proactive measures to improve grid reliability. However, accurate EDF is a challenging problem due to external factors, such as the varying user routines, weather conditions, driving behaviors, unknown state of charge, etc. Furthermore, as concerns and restrictions about privacy and sustainability have grown, training data has become increasingly fragmented, resulting in distributed datasets scattered across different data silos and/or edge devices, calling for federated learning solutions. In this paper, we investigate different well-established time series forecasting methodologies to address the EDF problem, from statistical methods (the ARIMA family) to traditional machine learning models (such as XGBoost) and deep neural networks (GRU and LSTM). We provide an overview of these methods through a performance comparison over four real-world EVSE datasets, evaluated under both centralized and federated learning paradigms, focusing on the trade-offs between forecasting fidelity, privacy preservation, and energy overheads. Our experimental results demonstrate, on the one hand, the superiority of gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) over statistical and NN-based models in both prediction accuracy and energy efficiency and, on the other hand, an insight that Federated Learning-enabled models balance these factors, offering a promising direction for decentralized energy demand forecasting.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2020Can Federated Learning Save The Planet?cited by 52
- 2019Energy Demand Prediction with Federated Learning for Electric Vehicle Networkscited by 46
- 2022Electrical Load Forecasting Using Edge Computing and Federated Learningcited by 34
- 2023Gradient-less Federated Gradient Boosting Trees with Learnable Learning Ratescited by 12
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.