mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Elimination-compensation pruning for fully-connected neural networks

arXiv 2602.20467 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The unmatched ability of Deep Neural Networks in capturing complex patterns in large and noisy datasets is often associated with their large hypothesis space, and consequently to the vast amount of parameters that characterize model architectures. Pruning techniques affirmed themselves as valid tools to extract sparse representations of neural networks parameters, carefully balancing between compression and preservation of information. However, a fundamental assumption behind pruning is that expendable weights should have small impact on the error of the network, while highly important weights should tend to have a larger influence on the inference. We argue that this idea could be generalized; what if a weight is not simply removed but also compensated with a perturbation of the adjacent bias, which does not contribute to the network sparsity? Our work introduces a novel pruning method in which the importance measure of each weight is computed considering the output behavior after an optimal perturbation of its adjacent bias, efficiently computable by automatic differentiation. These perturbations can be then applied directly after the removal of each weight, independently of each other. After deriving analytical expressions for the aforementioned quantities, numerical experiments are conducted to benchmark this technique against some of the most popular pruning strategies, demonstrating an intrinsic efficiency of the proposed approach in very diverse machine learning scenarios. Finally, our findings are discussed and the theoretical implications of our results are presented.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.

Builds on

12 of 35 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  2. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  3. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
  4. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  5. 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
  6. 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
  7. 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
  8. 2020Methods for Pruning Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
  9. 2021Deep Learning for Reduced Order Modelling and Efficient Temporal Evolution of Fluid Simulationscited by 36
  10. 2021Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networkscited by 21
  11. 2021A Probabilistic Approach to Neural Network Pruningcited by 15
  12. 2016NoiseOut: A Simple Way to Prune Neural Networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.