OpenPort Protocol: A Security Governance Specification for AI Agent Tool Access
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents increasingly require direct, structured access to application data and actions, but production deployments still struggle to express and verify the governance properties that matter in practice: least-privilege authorization, controlled write execution, predictable failure handling, abuse resistance, and auditability. This paper introduces OpenPort Protocol (OPP), a governance-first specification for exposing application tools through a secure server-side gateway that is model- and runtime-neutral and can bind to existing tool ecosystems. OpenPort defines authorization-dependent discovery, stable response envelopes with machine-actionable textttagent.* reason codes, and an authorization model combining integration credentials, scoped permissions, and ABAC-style policy constraints. For write operations, OpenPort specifies a risk-gated lifecycle that defaults to draft creation and human review, supports time-bounded auto-execution under explicit policy, and enforces high-risk safeguards including preflight impact binding and idempotency. To address time-of-check/time-of-use drift in delayed approval flows, OpenPort also specifies an optional State Witness profile that revalidates execution-time preconditions and fails closed on state mismatch. Operationally, the protocol requires admission control (rate limits/quotas) with stable 429 semantics and structured audit events across allow/deny/fail paths so that client recovery and incident analysis are deterministic. We present a reference runtime and an executable governance toolchain (layered conformance profiles, negative security tests, fuzz/abuse regression, and release-gate scans) and evaluate the core profile at a pinned release tag using artifact-based, externally reproducible validation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 23 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Intent-Governed Tool Authorization for AI Agentscited by 5
- 2026Versioned Transitive Dependency-Closure Binding and Operation-Time Effect Governance for Agent Skills: ClosureBoundcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governancecited by 0
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Budget Conservation in Distributed Multi-Agent Delegationcited by 0
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Budget Conservation in Distributed Multi-Agent Delegation29 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance9 Sep 2026
- 2026Versioned Transitive Dependency-Closure Binding and Operation-Time Effect Governance for Agent Skills: ClosureBound5 Sep 2026
- 2026Intent-Governed Tool Authorization for AI Agents22 Jun 2026