Learning Discriminative and Generalizable Anomaly Detector for Dynamic Graph with Limited Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic graph anomaly detection is critical for many real-world applications but remains challenging due to the scarcity of labeled anomalies. Existing methods are either unsupervised or semi-supervised: unsupervised methods avoid the need for labeled anomalies but often produce ambiguous boundary, whereas semi-supervised methods can overfit to the limited labeled anomalies and generalize poorly to unseen anomalies. To address this gap, we consider a largely underexplored problem: learning a discriminative boundary from normal/unlabeled data, while leveraging limited labeled anomalies when available without sacrificing generalization to unseen anomalies. In this paper, we propose an effective, generalizable, and model-agnostic framework with three main components: (i) residual representation encoding that capture deviations between current interactions and their historical context, providing anomaly-relevant signals; (ii) a restriction loss that constrain the normal representations within an interval bounded by two co-centered hyperspheres, ensuring consistent scales while keeping anomalies separable; (iii) a bi-boundary optimization strategy that learns a discriminative and robust boundary using the log-likelihood distribution modeled by a normalizing flow. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our framework across diverse evaluation settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
- 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 448
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Anomaly Detection with Deep Learningcited by 230
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 221
- 2021Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walkscited by 193
- 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
- 2020A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detectioncited by 151
- 2021GraphSMOTE: Imbalanced Node Classification on Graphs with Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
- 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 143
12 more
- 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 82
- 2021TCL: Transformer-based Dynamic Graph Modelling via Contrastive Learningcited by 68
- 2021Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Graphs via Transformercited by 59
- 2020Robust Optimization as Data Augmentation for Large-scale Graphscited by 58
- 2020Structural Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Graphscited by 56
- 2024Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 40
- 2023SAD: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection on Dynamic Graphscited by 28
- 2023Deep Orthogonal Hypersphere Compression for Anomaly Detectioncited by 12
- 2024A Generalizable Anomaly Detection Method in Dynamic Graphscited by 10
- 2022Motif-aware temporal GCN for fraud detection in signed cryptocurrency trust networkscited by 4
- 2024Learning-Based Link Anomaly Detection in Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphscited by 4
- 2021InFlow: Robust outlier detection utilizing Normalizing Flowscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.