Astra: Activation-Space Tail-Eigenvector Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, especially LoRA, are widely used for adapting pre-trained models to downstream tasks due to their computational and storage efficiency. However, in the context of LoRA and its variants, the potential of activation subspaces corresponding to tail eigenvectors remains substantially under-exploited, which may lead to suboptimal fine-tuning performance. In this work, we propose Astra (Activation-Space Tail-Eigenvector Low-Rank Adaptation), a novel PEFT method that leverages the tail eigenvectors of the model output activations-estimated from a small task-specific calibration set-to construct task-adaptive low-rank adapters. By constraining updates to the subspace spanned by these tail eigenvectors, Astra achieves faster convergence and improved downstream performance with a significantly reduced parameter budget. Extensive experiments across natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG) tasks demonstrate that Astra consistently outperforms existing PEFT baselines across 16 benchmarks and even surpasses full fine-tuning (FFT) in certain scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2026.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
11 more
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 365
- 2024OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinementcited by 242
- 2023A Rank Stabilization Scaling Factor for Fine-Tuning with LoRAcited by 231
- 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
- 2024MixLoRA: Enhancing Large Language Models Fine-Tuning with LoRA-based Mixture of Expertscited by 144
- 2024LoRA-GA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Gradient Approximationcited by 134
- 2025How Instruction and Reasoning Data shape Post-Training: Data Quality through the Lens of Layer-wise Gradientscited by 8
- 2024GRASP: Replace Redundant Layers with Adaptive Singular Parameters for Efficient Model Compressioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.