mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Detect Language Model Training Data via Active Reconstruction

arXiv 2602.19020 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting LLM training data is generally framed as a membership inference attack (MIA) problem. However, conventional MIAs operate passively on fixed model weights, using log-likelihoods or text generations. In this work, we introduce Active Data Reconstruction Attack (ADRA), a family of MIA that actively induces a model to reconstruct a given text through training. We hypothesize that training data are textitmore reconstructible than non-members, and the difference in their reconstructibility can be exploited for membership inference. Motivated by findings that reinforcement learning (RL) sharpens behaviors already encoded in weights, we leverage on-policy RL to actively elicit data reconstruction by finetuning a policy initialized from the target model. To effectively use RL for MIA, we design reconstruction metrics and contrastive rewards. The resulting algorithms, textscADRA and its adaptive variant textscADRA+, improve both reconstruction and detection given a pool of candidate data. Experiments show that our methods consistently outperform existing MIAs in detecting pre-training, post-training, and distillation data, with an average improvement of 10.7% over the previous runner-up. In particular, MethodPlus~improves over Min-K%++ by 18.8% on BookMIA for pre-training detection and by 7.6% on AIME for post-training detection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 40 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2026.

Builds on

40 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference with Simple N-Gram Coverage13 Aug
  2. 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Data29 Sep
  3. 2024Blind Baselines Beat Membership Inference Attacks for Foundation Models23 Jun
  4. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?10 Jun
  5. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?12 Feb
  6. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec

Other references · 34

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  4. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
  5. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  6. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  7. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  8. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  9. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  10. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
  11. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
  12. 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
22 more
  1. 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 288
  3. 2023Camels in a Changing Climate: Enhancing LM Adaptation with Tulu 2cited by 227
  4. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
  5. 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 192
  6. 2024Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuningcited by 174
  7. 2021Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Modelscited by 155
  8. 2023Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 147
  9. 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 139
  10. 2023What's In My Big Data?cited by 129
  11. 2024Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 102
  12. 2022Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secretscited by 94
  13. 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 72
  14. 2025Defeating the Training-Inference Mismatch via FP16cited by 62
  15. 2024Scaling Retrieval-Based Language Models with a Trillion-Token Datastorecited by 54
  16. 2024Measuring memorization in language models via probabilistic extractioncited by 40
  17. 2021Memorisation versus Generalisation in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 32
  18. 2024Evading Data Contamination Detection for Language Models is (too) Easycited by 30
  19. 2024Evaluation data contamination in LLMs: how do we measure it and (when) does it matter?cited by 30
  20. 2025Language Models May Verbatim Complete Text They Were Not Explicitly Trained Oncited by 20
  21. 2026Extracting books from production language modelscited by 16
  22. 2025Approximating Language Model Training Data from Weightscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.