GIST: Targeted Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Coupled Optimization Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Targeted data selection has emerged as a crucial paradigm for efficient instruction tuning, aiming to identify a small yet influential subset of training examples for a specific target task. In practice, influence is often measured through the effect of an example on parameter updates. To make selection scalable, many approaches leverage optimizer statistics (e.g., Adam states) as an axis-aligned surrogate for update geometry (i.e., diagonal precondition), implicitly treating parameters as coordinate-wise independent. We show that this assumption breaks down in parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as LoRA. In this setting, the induced optimization geometry exhibits strong cross-parameter coupling with non-trivial off-diagonal interactions, while the task-relevant update directions are confined to a low-dimensional subspace. Motivated by this mismatch, we propose GIST (Gradient Isometric Subspace Transformation), a simple yet principled alternative that replaces axis-aligned scaling with robust subspace alignment. GIST recovers a task-specific subspace from validation gradients via singular value decomposition (SVD), projects training gradients into this coupled subspace, and scores examples by their alignment with target directions. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that GIST matches or outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline with only 0.29% of the storage and 25% of the computational time under the same selection budget.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
References · 35
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
23 more
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
- 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
- 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 447
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
- 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
- 2016Eigenvalues of the Hessian in Deep Learning: Singularity and Beyondcited by 156
- 2020Traces of Class/Cross-Class Structure Pervade Deep Learning Spectracited by 94
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
- 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 83
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 34
- 2025Efficient Data Selection at Scale via Influence Distillationcited by 14
- 2024Scalable Fine-tuning from Multiple Data Sources: A First-Order Approximation Approachcited by 13
- 2020Selecting Informative Contexts Improves Language Model Finetuningcited by 11
- 2024Compute-Constrained Data Selectioncited by 10
- 2026Influence-Preserving Proxies for Gradient-Based Data Selection in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Pathscited by 0
- 2026Two to Tango: Coupled Task-Reference Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuningcited by 0
- 2026How Output Format Confounds Data Quality and Capability in Instruction Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Token Utility Is Selection-Conditioned: Coupled Selection of Prompt Context and Response Supervision for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)cited by 0
- 2026Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)1 Oct 2026
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning30 Sep 2026
- 2026Token Utility Is Selection-Conditioned: Coupled Selection of Prompt Context and Response Supervision for Efficient Instruction Tuning19 Sep 2026
- 2026How Output Format Confounds Data Quality and Capability in Instruction Tuning2 Sep 2026
- 2026Two to Tango: Coupled Task-Reference Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuning1 Jun 2026
- 2026Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Paths10 May 2026
- 2026One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning7 May 2026