mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GIST: Targeted Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Coupled Optimization Geometry

arXiv 2602.18584 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Targeted data selection has emerged as a crucial paradigm for efficient instruction tuning, aiming to identify a small yet influential subset of training examples for a specific target task. In practice, influence is often measured through the effect of an example on parameter updates. To make selection scalable, many approaches leverage optimizer statistics (e.g., Adam states) as an axis-aligned surrogate for update geometry (i.e., diagonal precondition), implicitly treating parameters as coordinate-wise independent. We show that this assumption breaks down in parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods such as LoRA. In this setting, the induced optimization geometry exhibits strong cross-parameter coupling with non-trivial off-diagonal interactions, while the task-relevant update directions are confined to a low-dimensional subspace. Motivated by this mismatch, we propose GIST (Gradient Isometric Subspace Transformation), a simple yet principled alternative that replaces axis-aligned scaling with robust subspace alignment. GIST recovers a task-specific subspace from validation gradients via singular value decomposition (SVD), projects training gradients into this coupled subspace, and scores examples by their alignment with target directions. Extensive experiments have demonstrated that GIST matches or outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline with only 0.29% of the storage and 25% of the computational time under the same selection budget.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

35 of 51 references.

References · 35

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  6. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  9. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  10. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  11. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  12. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
23 more
  1. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  2. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  3. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
  4. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
  5. 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 447
  6. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
  7. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  8. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
  9. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  10. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  11. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  12. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 289
  13. 2016Eigenvalues of the Hessian in Deep Learning: Singularity and Beyondcited by 156
  14. 2020Traces of Class/Cross-Class Structure Pervade Deep Learning Spectracited by 94
  15. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  16. 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 83
  17. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  18. 2025Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 34
  19. 2025Efficient Data Selection at Scale via Influence Distillationcited by 14
  20. 2024Scalable Fine-tuning from Multiple Data Sources: A First-Order Approximation Approachcited by 13
  21. 2020Selecting Informative Contexts Improves Language Model Finetuningcited by 11
  22. 2024Compute-Constrained Data Selectioncited by 10
  23. 2026Influence-Preserving Proxies for Gradient-Based Data Selection in LLM Fine-tuningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.