mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Suppression or Deletion: A Restoration-Based Representation-Level Analysis of Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2602.18505 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

As pretrained models are increasingly shared on the web, ensuring that models can forget or delete sensitive, copyrighted, or private information upon request has become crucial. Machine unlearning has been proposed to address this challenge. However, current evaluations for unlearning methods rely on output-based metrics, which cannot verify whether information is completely deleted or merely suppressed at the representation level, where suppression is insufficient for true unlearning. To address this gap, we propose a novel restoration-based analysis framework that uses Sparse Autoencoders to identify class-specific expert features in intermediate layers and applies inference-time steering to quantitatively distinguish between suppression and deletion. Applying our framework to 12 major unlearning methods in image classification tasks, we find that most methods achieve high restoration rates of unlearned information, indicating that they only suppress information at the decision-boundary level, while preserving semantic features in intermediate representations. Notably, even retraining from pretrained checkpoints shows high restoration, revealing that robust semantic features inherited from pretraining are not removed by retraining. These results demonstrate that representation-level retention poses significant risks overlooked by output-based metrics, highlighting the need for new unlearning evaluation criteria. We propose new evaluation guidelines that prioritize representation-level verification, especially for privacy-critical applications in the era of pre-trained models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Unlearning Comparator: A Visual Analytics System for Comparative Evaluation of Machine Unlearning Methods18 Aug
  2. 2025Are We Truly Forgetting? A Critical Re-examination of Machine Unlearning Evaluation Protocols10 Mar
  3. 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening15 Aug
  4. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  5. 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teacher17 May
  6. 2022Towards Adversarial Evaluations for Inexact Machine Unlearning17 Jan
  7. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearning17 Nov

Other references · 7

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  4. 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
  5. 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 129
  6. 2024Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 95
  7. 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Erase at the Core: Representation Unlearning for Machine Unlearning
  2. 2023Deep Unlearning: Fast and Efficient Gradient-free Approach to Class Forgetting
  3. 2026Class Unlearning via Depth-Aware Removal of Forget-Specific Directions
  4. 2026Representation Unlearning: Forgetting through Information Compression
  5. 2024Class Machine Unlearning for Complex Data via Concepts Inference and Data Poisoning
  6. 2026PURGE: Projected Unlearning via Retain-Guided Erasure
  7. 2026Forgetting Similar Samples: Can Machine Unlearning Do it Better?
  8. 2026An Illusion of Unlearning? Assessing Machine Unlearning Through Internal Representations