mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can AI Lower the Barrier to Cybersecurity? A Human-Centered Mixed-Methods Study of Novice CTF Learning

arXiv 2602.18172 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Capture-the-Flag (CTF) competitions serve as gateways into offensive cybersecurity, yet they often present steep barriers for novices due to complex toolchains and opaque workflows. Recently, agentic AI frameworks for cybersecurity promise to lower these barriers by automating and coordinating penetration testing tasks. However, their role in shaping novice learning remains underexplored. We present a human-centered, mixed-methods case study examining how agentic AI frameworks -- here Cybersecurity AI (CAI) -- mediates novice entry into CTF-based penetration testing. An undergraduate student without prior hacking experience attempted to approach performance benchmarks from a national cybersecurity challenge using CAI. Quantitative performance metrics were complemented by structured reflective analysis of learning progression and AI interaction patterns. Our thematic analysis suggest that agentic AI reduces initial entry barriers by providing overview, structure and guidance, thereby lowering the cognitive workload during early engagement. Quantitatively, the observed extensive exploration of strategies and low per-strategy execution time potetially facilitatates cybersecurity training on meta, i.e. strategic levels. At the same time, AI-assisted cybersecurity education introduces new challenges related to trust, dependency, and responsible use. We discuss implications for human-centered AI-supported cybersecurity education and outline open questions for future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Cybersecurity AI Benchmark (CAIBench): A Meta-Benchmark for Evaluating Cybersecurity AI Agents28 Oct

Other references · 8

  1. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 156
  2. 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  3. 2026How AI Impacts Skill Formationcited by 20
  4. 2025Benchmarking Practices in LLM-driven Offensive Security: Testbeds, Metrics, and Experiment Designcited by 13
  5. 2025On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testingcited by 9
  6. 2021Cybersecurity Knowledge and Skills Taught in Capture the Flag Challengescited by 6
  7. 2025Evaluating AI cyber capabilities with crowdsourced elicitationcited by 5
  8. 2025The Architecture of Cognitive Amplification: Enhanced Cognitive Scaffolding as a Resolution to the Comfort-Growth Paradox in Human-AI Cognitive Integrationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AI In Cybersecurity Education -- Scalable Agentic CTF Design Principles and Educational Outcomes
  2. 2025Cybersecurity AI: Evaluating Agentic Cybersecurity in Attack/Defense CTFs
  3. 2025Measuring and Augmenting Large Language Models for Solving Capture-the-Flag Challenges
  4. 2026When Skills Don't Help: A Negative Result on Procedural Knowledge for Tool-Grounded Agents in Offensive Cybersecurity
  5. 2026Cybersecurity AI: A Game-Theoretic AI for Guiding Attack and Defense
  6. 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes
  7. 2025AgentBnB: A Browser-Based Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercise with Large Language Model Support and Retrieval-Aligned Scaffolding
  8. 2025Agentic AI for Cyber Resilience: A New Security Paradigm and Its System-Theoretic Foundations