mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Turbo Connection: Reasoning as Information Flow from Higher to Lower Layers

arXiv 2602.17993 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Complex problems, whether in math, logic, or planning, are solved by humans through a sequence of steps where the result of one step informs the next. In this work, we adopt the perspective that the reasoning power of Transformers is fundamentally limited by a fixed maximum number of steps along any latent path of computation. To address this, we introduce Turbo Connection (TurboConn), a novel architecture that overcomes the fixed-depth constraint by routing multiple residual connections from the higher-layer hidden states of each token t to the lower layers of token t+1. Fine-tuning pre-trained LLMs with our method not only yields accuracy gains of 0.9% to over 10% on benchmarks like GSM8K, Parity, and multi-step arithmetic, but also demonstrates that the density of these backward connections is critical; our dense interaction significantly outperforms "sparse" alternatives that only pass a single hidden state or vector. Notably, TurboConn can be integrated into pre-trained LLMs to overcome task-specific plateaus: while a fine-tuned Qwen-3-1.7B achieves only 53.78% on Parity, adding our architectural modification enables the model to reach 100% accuracy, all without the necessity to retrain the full model from scratch or sophisticated curriculum learning. Our results provide strong empirical evidence that the depth of the computational path is a key factor in reasoning ability, also offering a new mechanism to enhance LLMs without significantly affecting generation latency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

Builds on

23 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space9 Dec
  2. 2024Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems20 Feb
  3. 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillation2 Nov
  4. 2023Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspective24 May
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners24 May
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan

Other references · 17

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  4. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
  5. 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 372
  6. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 292
  7. 2023Looped Transformers as Programmable Computerscited by 224
  8. 2025Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformerscited by 223
  9. 2022The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformerscited by 191
  10. 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 156
  11. 2024Looped Transformers for Length Generalizationcited by 91
  12. 2024Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queriescited by 78
5 more
  1. 2022Solving Math Word Problems via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Modelscited by 76
  2. 2024AceMath: Advancing Frontier Math Reasoning with Post-Training and Reward Modelingcited by 76
  3. 2025AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergycited by 75
  4. 2025PonderLM: Pretraining Language Models to Ponder in Continuous Spacecited by 44
  5. 2021Staircase Attention for Recurrent Processing of Sequencescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026T^2MLR: Transformer with Temporal Middle-Layer Recurrence
  2. 2025Transformers Provably Learn Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Length Generalization
  3. 2024Transformers Provably Solve Parity Efficiently with Chain of Thought
  4. 2025Hydra: A Modular Architecture for Efficient Long-Context Reasoning
  5. 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalization
  6. 2025Multi-head Transformers Provably Learn Symbolic Multi-step Reasoning via Gradient Descent
  7. 2026Adaptive Loops and Memory in Transformers: Think Harder or Know More?
  8. 2026Efficient Reasoning via Constrained Optimization in Latent Space