MARS: Margin and Semantic-Aware Data Augmentation for Reward Modeling
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Reward modeling is central to RLHF, RLAIF, and PPO-based alignment, but its reliability is often limited by scarce and heterogeneous human preference data. In this paper, we introduce MARS (Margin and Semantic-Aware Data Augmentation for Reward Modeling), an adaptive augmentation framework for controlled low-resource reward modeling. MARS allocates more augmentation to low-margin preference pairs and uses semantic-distance-based refinement to improve chosen-rejected contrast before generating synthetic preference samples. Across three preference datasets, two reward-model backbones, and downstream alignment evaluations, MARS improves average RewardBench performance and alignment win rates over uniform augmentation, WoN, and AdaBoost-style baselines. Ablations and independent-judge evaluations suggest that the gains are not solely explained by semantic refinement alone or GPT-4.1 judge coupling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking20 Sep
- 2024BOND: Aligning LLMs with Best-of-N Distillation19 Jul
- 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models22 Jan
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 16
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
- 2016Training Region-based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Miningcited by 577
- 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 446
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
- 2024BoNBoN Alignment for Large Language Models and the Sweetness of Best-of-n Samplingcited by 120
4 more
- 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agentscited by 96
- 2024Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insightscited by 88
- 2024LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptionscited by 45
- 2024Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Promptscited by 36
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Energy-Based Preference Model Offers Better Offline Alignment than the Bradley-Terry Preference Model
- 2026Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization
- 2026Beyond Binary Preferences: A Principled Framework for Reward Modeling with Ordinal Feedback
- 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025APLOT: Robust Reward Modeling via Adaptive Preference Learning with Optimal Transport
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy
- 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
- 2025Probing Preference Representations: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Analysis Method for Reward Models