On the Mechanism and Dynamics of Modular Addition: Fourier Features, Lottery Ticket, and Grokking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a comprehensive analysis of how two-layer neural networks learn features to solve the modular addition task. Our work provides a full mechanistic interpretation of the learned model and a theoretical explanation of its training dynamics. While prior work has identified that individual neurons learn single-frequency Fourier features and phase alignment, it does not fully explain how these features combine into a global solution. We bridge this gap by formalizing a diversification condition that emerges during training when overparametrized, consisting of two parts: phase symmetry and frequency diversification. We prove that these properties allow the network to collectively approximate a flawed indicator function on the correct logic for the modular addition task. While individual neurons produce noisy signals, the phase symmetry enables a majority-voting scheme that cancels out noise, allowing the network to robustly identify the correct sum. Furthermore, we explain the emergence of these features under random initialization via a lottery ticket mechanism. Our gradient flow analysis proves that frequencies compete within each neuron, with the "winner" determined by its initial spectral magnitude and phase alignment. From a technical standpoint, we provide a rigorous characterization of the layer-wise phase coupling dynamics and formalize the competitive landscape using the ODE comparison lemma. Finally, we use these insights to demystify grokking, characterizing it as a three-stage process involving memorization followed by two generalization phases, driven by the competition between loss minimization and weight decay.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Spectral Lens: Activation and Gradient Spectra as Diagnostics of LLM Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026Assign and Add: A Mechanistic Study of Compositional Arithmeticcited by 0
- 2026A Counterexample to Fourier Alignment in Single-Neuron Modular Additioncited by 0
- 2026Symmetry without a manifold: intrinsic dimension on orbitscited by 0
- 2026A Spectral Theory of Grokking: Weight Decay induces Feature Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Spectral Theory of Grokking: Weight Decay induces Feature Learning22 Sep 2026
- 2026Symmetry without a manifold: intrinsic dimension on orbits15 Sep 2026
- 2026A Counterexample to Fourier Alignment in Single-Neuron Modular Addition5 Aug 2026
- 2026Assign and Add: A Mechanistic Study of Compositional Arithmetic29 May 2026
- 2026Spectral Lens: Activation and Gradient Spectra as Diagnostics of LLM Optimization7 May 2026