mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BanglaSummEval: Reference-Free Factual Consistency Evaluation for Bangla Summarization

arXiv 2602.16843 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating factual consistency is essential for reliable text summarization, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and news. However, most existing evaluation metrics overlook Bangla, a widely spoken yet under-resourced language, and often depend on reference summaries. We introduce BanglaSummEval, a reference-free, question-answering-based framework for evaluating factual consistency in Bangla summarization. The proposed method assesses both factual accuracy and content coverage through automatically generated questions and answers derived from the source document and the summary. A single multilingual instruction-tuned language model handles question generation, question answering, candidate answer extraction, and question importance weighting. This unified design reduces system complexity and computational cost. To capture semantic consistency beyond surface-level overlap, we use BERTScore-Recall for answer comparison. We validate BanglaSummEval on 300 human-written summaries from educational and medical domains, demonstrating strong correlation with expert human judgments (Pearson's r = 0.694, Spearman's ρ = 0.763). By providing interpretable, step-wise diagnostics alongside reliable evaluation scores, BanglaSummEval offers a practical and transparent solution for factual consistency evaluation in low-resource language settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  2. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  3. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  4. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  5. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  6. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 241
  7. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  8. 2022Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarizationcited by 90
  9. 2021Unsupervised Abstractive Summarization of Bengali Text Documentscited by 9
  10. 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summariescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.