mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DistributedEstimator: Distributed Training of Quantum Neural Networks via Circuit Cutting

arXiv 2602.16233 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.DC cs.LG quant-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Circuit cutting decomposes a large quantum circuit into smaller subcircuits executed independently; expectation values are recovered by classically combining subcircuit outcomes. Prior work characterises cutting overhead via subcircuit counts and sampling complexity, but its end-to-end impact on iterative, estimator-driven training pipelines remains under-measured from a systems perspective. We propose DistributedEstimator, a cut-aware estimator execution pipeline that treats circuit cutting as a staged distributed workload, instrumenting each query across four phases: partitioning, subexperiment generation, parallel execution, and classical reconstruction. Using logged runtime traces and learning outcomes on two binary classification workloads (Iris and MNIST), we quantify cutting overheads, scaling limits, and sensitivity to injected stragglers, and assess whether accuracy and robustness are preserved under matched training budgets. Reconstruction dominates per-query time -- a median of 53% and 95th percentile of 58% at three cuts -- bounding achievable speed-up under parallelism. Despite this, test accuracy is fully preserved on Iris and maintained without systematic degradation on MNIST across all cut configurations. Robustness under Gaussian noise and FGSM perturbations is similarly preserved, with several configurations matching or improving on the uncut baseline. Exponential growth of subexperiment counts (O(9c) for CNOT-based decomposition) is a fundamental barrier limiting practical experimentation to small qubit counts. These results establish that practical scaling for learning workloads requires reducing and overlapping reconstruction, scheduling policies for barrier-dominated critical paths, and computationally efficient reconstruction strategies for larger qubit counts.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 48 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  5. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  6. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  7. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  8. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  9. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
  10. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
  11. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
  12. 2018Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlowcited by 275
3 more
  1. 2020TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learningcited by 72
  2. 2024Curriculum reinforcement learning for quantum architecture search under hardware errorscited by 37
  3. 2022QFaaS: A Serverless Function-as-a-Service Framework for Quantum Computingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.