Quality-constrained Entropy Maximization Policy Optimization for LLM Diversity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many large language model (LLM) alignment applications, users expect not only high-quality outputs but also substantial diversity. However, existing methods often face a fundamental trade-off between these objectives: approaches that improve output quality tend to reduce diversity, while methods that increase diversity often do so at the expense of quality. In this work, we propose Quality-constrained Entropy Maximization Policy Optimization (QEMPO), a novel framework that enhances the diversity of LLM outputs while explicitly preserving output quality. QEMPO is grounded in a strong theoretical foundation: we derive a closed-form analytical solution that provably maximizes entropy-a principled measure of diversity-subject to a quality constraint, with guarantees on optimality under the defined objective. Leveraging this solution, QEMPO naturally supports both online and offline training settings. Empirical results demonstrate that QEMPO consistently improves output diversity without sacrificing quality, and in many cases yields gains in both dimensions compared to existing baselines, aligning with our theoretical guarantees.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
References · 28
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2023Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?cited by 190
16 more
- 2020Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generationcited by 94
- 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2024One fish, two fish, but not the whole sea: Alignment reduces language models' conceptual diversitycited by 57
- 2025xVerify: Efficient Answer Verifier for Reasoning Model Evaluationscited by 53
- 2025Evaluating the Diversity and Quality of LLM Generated Contentcited by 51
- 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 48
- 2024Benchmarking Linguistic Diversity of Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2025GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 32
- 2025Diverse Preference Learning for Capabilities and Alignmentcited by 25
- 2024Balancing Diversity and Risk in LLM Sampling: How to Select Your Method and Parameter for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 18
- 2025Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 14
- 2024The Hyperfitting Phenomenon: Sharpening and Stabilizing LLMs for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 9
- 2025Diversity-oriented Data Augmentation with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Improving Diversity in Language Models: When Temperature Fails, Change the Losscited by 7
- 2021EnTRPO: Trust Region Policy Optimization Method with Entropy Regularizationcited by 2
- 2025Understanding the Effects of RLHF on the Quality and Detectability of LLM-Generated Textscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Where does output diversity collapse in post-training?cited by 10
- 2026Where does output diversity collapse in post-training?17 Apr 2026