Causal Effect Estimation with Latent Textual Treatments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the causal effects of text on downstream outcomes is a central task in many applications. Estimating such effects requires researchers to run controlled experiments that systematically vary textual features. While large language models (LLMs) hold promise for generating text, producing and evaluating controlled variation requires more careful attention. In this paper, we present an end-to-end pipeline for the generation and causal estimation of latent textual interventions. Our work first performs hypothesis generation and steering via sparse autoencoders (SAEs), followed by robust causal estimation. Our pipeline addresses both computational and statistical challenges in text-as-treatment experiments. We demonstrate that naive estimation of causal effects suffers from significant bias as text inherently conflates treatment and covariate information. We describe the estimation bias induced in this setting and propose a solution based on covariate residualization. Our empirical results show that our pipeline effectively induces variation in target features and mitigates estimation error, providing a robust foundation for causal effect estimation in text-as-treatment settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 328
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 199
- 2021Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyondcited by 177
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 109
- 2024RAVEL: Evaluating Interpretability Methods on Disentangling Language Model Representationscited by 77
- 2018How to Make Causal Inferences Using Textscited by 59
- 2020Causal Effects of Linguistic Propertiescited by 39
- 2018Matching with Text Data: An Experimental Evaluation of Methods for Matching Documents and of Measuring Match Qualitycited by 21
6 more
- 2025Position: Use Sparse Autoencoders to Discover Unknownscited by 17
- 2024Causal Inference with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Application to Texts as Treatmentscited by 16
- 2022Causal Estimation for Text Data with (Apparent) Overlap Violationscited by 15
- 2021Us vs. Them: A Dataset of Populist Attitudes, News Bias and Emotionscited by 9
- 2025Model Directions, Not Words: Mechanistic Topic Models Using Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2025Causal Inference on Outcomes Learned from Textcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.