mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

D2-LoRA: A Synergistic Approach to Differential and Directional Low-Rank Adaptation

arXiv 2602.14728 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We systematically investigate the parameter-efficient fine-tuning design space under practical data and compute constraints, and propose D2-LoRA. D2-LoRA achieves 76.4 percent average accuracy across eight question answering and reading comprehension benchmarks using only 5k training samples per task and two epochs, while preserving algebraic mergeability at inference with near-exact numerical equivalence. The method combines signed low-rank residual updates with additive and subtractive components, together with a train-time column-wise projection that keeps each column close to its original norm. After training, the adapter is merged into a single weight matrix, adding zero inference latency. Compared with LoRA, D2-LoRA improves average accuracy by 2.2 percentage points; at matched parameter counts (LoRA rank 2r versus D2-LoRA rank r), the improvement is 1.6 points, indicating gains from architectural design rather than increased parameterization. Compared with DoRA, it matches or exceeds performance on most tasks. Beyond QA and reading comprehension, D2-LoRA improves generative tasks (plus 1.2 ROUGE-L and plus 1.1 percent win rate) and shows 36 percent lower training volatility. The merge preserves numerical fidelity (mean gap about 0.03 percentage points) and recovers about 1.91x evaluation throughput. Training overhead is 19 percent, comparable to DoRA, and decreases with longer input sequences. We provide a geometric analysis explaining how the projection stabilizes training, together with ablation studies isolating the contribution of each design component.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 23 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  7. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  10. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  11. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  12. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
5 more
  1. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  2. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
  3. 2023AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 337
  4. 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 319
  5. 2023UniAdapter: Unified Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Cross-modal Modelingcited by 40

Built on by

Not cited yet.