BETA-Labeling for Multilingual Dataset Construction in Low-Resource IR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
IR in low-resource languages remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality, task-specific annotated datasets. Manual annotation is expensive and difficult to scale, while using large language models (LLMs) as automated annotators introduces concerns about label reliability, bias, and evaluation validity. This work presents a Bangla IR dataset constructed using a BETA-labeling framework involving multiple LLM annotators from diverse model families. The framework incorporates contextual alignment, consistency checks, and majority agreement, followed by human evaluation to verify label quality. Beyond dataset creation, we examine whether IR datasets from other low-resource languages can be effectively reused through one-hop machine translation. Using LLM-based translation across multiple language pairs, we experimented on meaning preservation and task validity between source and translated datasets. Our experiment reveal substantial variation across languages, reflecting language-dependent biases and inconsistent semantic preservation that directly affect the reliability of cross-lingual dataset reuse. Overall, this study highlights both the potential and limitations of LLM-assisted dataset creation for low-resource IR. It provides empirical evidence of the risks associated with cross-lingual dataset reuse and offers practical guidance for constructing more reliable benchmarks and evaluation pipelines in low-resource language settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
- 2020XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoningcited by 330
- 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
- 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 78
- 2022Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval with Noise-Robust Learningcited by 22
- 2024ArabicaQA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Arabic Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2022Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metricscited by 14
9 more
- 2022Consistent Human Evaluation of Machine Translation across Language Pairscited by 13
- 2024LLM-Assisted Relevance Assessments: When Should We Ask LLMs for Help?cited by 11
- 2024Translation Errors Significantly Impact Low-Resource Languages in Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 9
- 2025Myanmar XNLI: Building a Dataset and Exploring Low-resource Approaches to Natural Language Inference with Myanmarcited by 8
- 2024MIND Your Language: A Multilingual Dataset for Cross-lingual News Recommendationcited by 5
- 2024Cross-Lingual Transfer Robustness to Lower-Resource Languages on Adversarial Datasetscited by 5
- 2025Dense Retrieval for Low Resource Languages -- the Case of Amharic Languagecited by 3
- 2024CWRCzech: 100M Query-Document Czech Click Dataset and Its Application to Web Relevance Rankingcited by 2
- 2025Semantic Label Drift in Cross-Cultural Translationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.