A Theoretical Framework for LLM Fine-tuning Using Early Stopping for Non-random Initialization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of large language models (LLMs), fine-tuning pretrained models has become ubiquitous. Yet the theoretical underpinning remains an open question. A central question is why only a few epochs of fine-tuning are typically sufficient to achieve strong performance on many different tasks. In this work, we approach this question by developing a statistical framework, combining rigorous early stopping theory with the attention-based Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) for LLMs, offering new theoretical insights on fine-tuning practices. Specifically, we formally extend classical NTK theory [Jacot et al., 2018] to non-random (i.e., pretrained) initializations and provide a convergence guarantee for attention-based fine-tuning. One key insight provided by the theory is that the convergence rate with respect to sample size is closely linked to the eigenvalue decay rate of the empirical kernel matrix induced by the NTK. We also demonstrate how the framework can be used to explain task vectors for multiple tasks in LLMs. Finally, experiments with modern language models on real-world datasets provide empirical evidence supporting our theoretical insights.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2026.
Builds on
25 of 45 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
13 more
- 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
- 2019Tensor Programs I: Wide Feedforward or Recurrent Neural Networks of Any Architecture are Gaussian Processescited by 148
- 2019Scaling Limits of Wide Neural Networks with Weight Sharing: Gaussian Process Behavior, Gradient Independence, and Neural Tangent Kernel Derivationcited by 146
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
- 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
- 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
- 2021Tensor Programs IIb: Architectural Universality of Neural Tangent Kernel Training Dynamicscited by 57
- 2025When is Task Vector Provably Effective for Model Editing? A Generalization Analysis of Nonlinear Transformerscited by 38
- 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
- 2022Parameter-Efficient Tuning Makes a Good Classification Headcited by 15
- 2022Adaptive Fine-Tuning of Transformer-Based Language Models for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 3
- 2024Reliable and scalable variable importance estimation via warm-start and early stoppingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026TopoTuner: Topological Finetuning of Large Language Models18 Jul 2026