Singular Vectors of Attention Heads Align with Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying feature representations in language models is a central task in mechanistic interpretability. Several recent studies have made the observation that feature representations can be inferred in some cases from singular vectors of attention matrices. However, sound justification for this phenomenon is lacking. In this paper we address that question, asking: why and when do singular vectors align with features? First, we demonstrate that singular vectors robustly align with features in a model where features can be directly observed. We then show theoretically that such alignment is expected under a range of conditions. We close by asking how, operationally, alignment may be recognized in real models where feature representations are not directly observable. We identify sparse attention decomposition as a testable prediction of alignment, and show evidence that it emerges in real models in a manner consistent with predictions. Together these results suggest that alignment of singular vectors with features can be a sound and theoretically justified basis for feature identification in language models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 47 references.
References · 32
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
20 more
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 250
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 190
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 80
- 2025Language Models Use Trigonometry to Do Additioncited by 68
- 2024Anisotropy Is Inherent to Self-Attention in Transformerscited by 62
- 2024LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scalecited by 60
- 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structurecited by 52
- 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Modelscited by 39
- 2024Language Models Encode Numbers Using Digit Representations in Base 10cited by 32
- 2024Dissecting Query-Key Interaction in Vision Transformerscited by 12
- 2025Beyond Components: Singular Vector-Based Interpretability of Transformer Circuitscited by 6
- 2024Sparse Attention Decomposition Applied to Circuit Tracingcited by 4
- 2025A Capacity-Based Rationale for Multi-Head Attentioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Representation Alignment Rests on Linear Structure
- 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Alignment Algorithms in Language Models
- 2026Rethinking Contextualization by Reinterpreting Attention Head Channels
- 2026Beyond Linear Concepts: Discovering and Aligning Non-Linear Concept Manifolds in Large Language Models
- 2020Aligning the Pretraining and Finetuning Objectives of Language Models
- 2025Uncovering the Computational Ingredients of Human-Like Representations in LLMs
- 2023Analyzing Text Representations by Measuring Task Alignment
- 2024Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approach