mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Classifiers: A Case Study Using PyCM

arXiv 2602.13482 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting an optimal classification model requires a robust and comprehensive understanding of the performance of the model. This paper provides a tutorial on the PyCM library, demonstrating its utility in conducting deep-dive evaluations of multi-class classifiers. By examining two different case scenarios, we illustrate how the choice of evaluation metrics can fundamentally shift the interpretation of a model's efficacy. Our findings emphasize that a multi-dimensional evaluation framework is essential for uncovering small but important differences in model performance. However, standard metrics may miss these subtle performance trade-offs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

2 of 33 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
  2. 2024A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.