Language Model Memory and Memory Models for Language
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability of machine learning models to store input information in hidden layer vector embeddings, analogous to the concept of `memory', is widely employed but not well characterized. We find that language model embeddings typically contain relatively little input information regardless of data and compute scale during training. In contrast, embeddings from autoencoders trained for input regeneration are capable of nearly perfect memory formation. The substitution of memory embeddings for token sequences leads to substantial computational efficiencies, motivating the introduction of a parallelizable encoder-decoder memory model architecture. Upon causal training these models contain information-poor embeddings incapable of arbitrary information access, but by combining causal and information retention objective functions they learn to form and decode information-rich memories. Training can be further streamlined by freezing a high fidelity encoder followed by a curriculum training approach where decoders first learn to process memories and then learn to additionally predict next tokens. We introduce the perspective that next token prediction training alone is poorly suited for accurate memory formation as the objective itself is non-invertible, motivating the use of combined objective functions for models where the entire input is not exposed.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
- 2022Recurrent Memory Transformercited by 197
- 2025On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-Based Retrievalcited by 98
- 2021Not All Memories are Created Equal: Learning to Forget by Expiringcited by 32
- 2025Controllably Efficient Language Modelscited by 2
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.