mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Online Reference-Free Evaluation Framework for Flowchart Image-to-Code Generation

arXiv 2602.13376 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in document processing pipelines to convert flowchart images into structured code (e.g., Mermaid). In production, these systems process arbitrary inputs for which no ground-truth code exists, making output quality difficult to assess. We propose a reference-free evaluation framework that monitors flowchart image-to-code generation quality at inference time, using only the input image and the generated output. The framework introduces two automated metrics: RecallOCR, which estimates content coverage by extracting text from the input image via OCR as a proxy reference, and PrecisionVE, which detects hallucinated elements through Visual Entailment against the original image. Their harmonic mean, F1OCR-VE, provides a unified quality score. Validation on the FlowVQA dataset shows strong agreement with ground-truth metrics (average Pearson's r = 0.97, 0.91, and 0.94 for Recall, Precision, and F1, respectively), confirming the framework's reliability as a practical, reference-free alternative for continuous quality monitoring in production settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Beyond End-to-End VLMs: Leveraging Intermediate Text Representations for Superior Flowchart Understanding21 Dec
  2. 2024FlowLearn: Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models on Flowchart Understanding6 Jul
  3. 2024FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowcharts27 Jun
  4. 2023Do LVLMs Understand Charts? Analyzing and Correcting Factual Errors in Chart Captioning15 Dec

Other references · 7

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  2. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  3. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  4. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  5. 2019Visual Entailment: A Novel Task for Fine-Grained Image Understandingcited by 250
  6. 2024Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluationcited by 123
  7. 2024Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language?cited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Vision2Code: A Multi-Domain Benchmark for Evaluating Image-to-Code Generation
  2. 2025Flowchart2Mermaid: A Vision-Language Model Powered System for Converting Flowcharts into Editable Diagram Code
  3. 2026RealChart2Code: Advancing Chart-to-Code Generation with Real Data and Multi-Task Evaluation
  4. 2026VCG-Bench: Towards A Unified Visual-Centric Benchmark for Structured Generation and Editing
  5. 2025Arrow-Guided VLM: Enhancing Flowchart Understanding via Arrow Direction Encoding
  6. 2025ChartGen: Scaling Chart Understanding Via Code-Guided Synthetic Chart Generation
  7. 2024TypeScore: A Text Fidelity Metric for Text-to-Image Generative Models
  8. 2025PlotGen-Bench: Evaluating VLMs on Generating Visualization Code from Diverse Plots across Multiple Libraries