mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Empowering 9-1-1 Calltaking Training with Generative AI: Experiences and Lessons Learned

arXiv 2602.13241 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emergency call-takers form the first operational link in public safety response, handling over 240 million calls annually while facing a sustained training crisis: staffing shortages exceed 25% in many centers, and preparing a single new hire can require up to 720 hours of one-on-one instruction that removes experienced personnel from active duty. Traditional training approaches struggle to scale under these constraints, limiting both coverage and feedback timeliness. In partnership with Metro Nashville Department of Emergency Communications (MNDEC), we designed, developed, and deployed a GenAI-powered call-taking training system under real-world constraints. Over six months, deployment scaled from initial pilot to 190 operational users across 1,120 training sessions, exposing systematic challenges around system delivery, rigor, resilience, and human factors that remain largely invisible in controlled or purely simulated evaluations. By analyzing deployment logs capturing 98,429 user interactions, organizational processes, and stakeholder engagement patterns, we distill four key lessons, each coupled with concrete design and governance practices. These lessons provide grounded guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to deliver AI-driven training systems in safety-critical public sector environments where practical constraints fundamentally shape human-centric design.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  5. 2025Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithfulcited by 170
  6. 2021To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 118
  7. 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 88
  8. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 87
  9. 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
  10. 2024From Role-Play to Drama-Interaction: An LLM Solutioncited by 42
  11. 2023Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAIcited by 33
  12. 2023A Systematic Review on Fostering Appropriate Trust in Human-AI Interactioncited by 21
8 more
  1. 2024Exploring Context Window of Large Language Models via Decomposed Positional Vectorscited by 18
  2. 2023Mastering Symbolic Operations: Augmenting Language Models with Compiled Neural Networkscited by 12
  3. 2022CitySpec: An Intelligent Assistant System for Requirement Specification in Smart Citiescited by 9
  4. 2023CitySpec with Shield: A Secure Intelligent Assistant for Requirement Formalizationcited by 7
  5. 2024Sim911: Towards Effective and Equitable 9-1-1 Dispatcher Training with an LLM-Enabled Simulationcited by 6
  6. 2025LogiDebrief: A Signal-Temporal Logic based Automated Debriefing Approach with Large Language Models Integrationcited by 5
  7. 2022An Intelligent Assistant for Converting City Requirements to Formal Specificationcited by 4
  8. 2023Auto311: A Confidence-guided Automated System for Non-emergency Callscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.