Rational Neural Networks have Expressivity Advantages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study neural networks with trainable low-degree rational activation functions and show that they are more expressive and parameter-efficient than modern piecewise-linear and smooth activations such as ELU, LeakyReLU, LogSigmoid, PReLU, ReLU, SELU, CELU, Sigmoid, SiLU, Mish, Softplus, Tanh, Softmin, Softmax, and LogSoftmax. For an error target of varepsilon>0, we establish approximation-theoretic separations: Any network built from standard fixed activations can be uniformly approximated on compact domains by a rational-activation network with only poly(loglog(1/varepsilon)) overhead in size, while the converse provably requires Omega(log(1/varepsilon)) parameters in the worst case. This exponential gap persists at the level of full networks and extends to gated activations and transformer-style nonlinearities. In practice, rational activations integrate seamlessly into standard architectures and training pipelines, allowing rationals to match or outperform fixed activations under identical architectures and optimizers.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
30 of 48 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
18 more
- 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 764
- 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
- 2020Rational neural networkscited by 75
- 2017Continuously Differentiable Exponential Linear Unitscited by 73
- 2019Pad'e Activation Units: End-to-end Learning of Flexible Activation Functions in Deep Networkscited by 67
- 2019On the Expressive Power of Deep Polynomial Neural Networkscited by 66
- 2021Data-driven discovery of Green's functions with human-understandable deep learningcited by 44
- 2017Neural networks and rational functionscited by 40
- 2021Adaptive Rational Activations to Boost Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2025Algebra Unveils Deep Learning -- An Invitation to Neuroalgebraic Geometrycited by 21
- 2025Learning on a Razor's Edge: Identifiability and Singularity of Polynomial Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2023Covering Number of Real Algebraic Varieties and Beyond: Improved Bounds and Applicationscited by 8
- 2025The Alexander-Hirschowitz theorem for neurovarietiescited by 6
- 2022Transformers with Learnable Activation Functionscited by 5
- 2025Balancing Expressivity and Robustness: Constrained Rational Activations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2025MNO : A Multi-modal Neural Operator for Parametric Nonlinear BVPscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Rational Sparse Autoencodercited by 0
- 2026Rationally Linearized MLPscited by 0
- 2026Rationally Linearized MLPs9 Oct 2026
- 2026Rational Sparse Autoencoder12 Jun 2026