mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Implicit Bias of Logit Regularization

arXiv 2602.12039 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Logit regularization, the addition of a convex penalty directly in logit space, is widely used in modern classifiers, with label smoothing as a prominent example. While such methods often improve calibration and generalization, their mechanism remains under-explored. In this work, we analyze a general class of such logit regularizers in the context of linear classification, and demonstrate that they induce an implicit bias of logit clustering around finite per-sample targets. For Gaussian data, or whenever logits are sufficiently clustered, we prove that logit clustering drives the weight vector to align exactly with Fisher's Linear Discriminant. To demonstrate the consequences, we study a simple signal-plus-noise model in which this transition has dramatic effects: Logit regularization halves the critical sample complexity and induces grokking in the small-noise limit, while making generalization robust to noise. Our results extend the theoretical understanding of label smoothing and highlight the efficacy of a broader class of logit-regularization methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

Builds on

30 of 45 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  7. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  8. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  9. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  11. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  12. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
18 more
  1. 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
  2. 2018A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 79
  3. 2022Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse Perspectivecited by 78
  4. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
  5. 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
  6. 2021Is Label Smoothing Truly Incompatible with Knowledge Distillation: An Empirical Studycited by 50
  7. 2023Rethinking Confidence Calibration for Failure Predictioncited by 43
  8. 2025Grokking at the Edge of Numerical Stabilitycited by 41
  9. 2022Revisiting Label Smoothing and Knowledge Distillation Compatibility: What was Missing?cited by 32
  10. 2023Grokking in Linear Estimators -- A Solvable Model that Groks without Understandingcited by 25
  11. 2024Neural Collapse versus Low-rank Bias: Is Deep Neural Collapse Really Optimal?cited by 16
  12. 2022Efficient One Pass Self-distillation with Zipf's Label Smoothingcited by 12
  13. 2024The Persistence of Neural Collapse Despite Low-Rank Biascited by 12
  14. 2024Cross Entropy versus Label Smoothing: A Neural Collapse Perspectivecited by 11
  15. 2024Towards Understanding Why Label Smoothing Degrades Selective Classification and How to Fix Itcited by 11
  16. 2024Grokking at the Edge of Linear Separabilitycited by 11
  17. 2022Adaptive Label Smoothing with Self-Knowledge in Natural Language Generationcited by 9
  18. 2023Quantifying the Variability Collapse of Neural Networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.