PAC-Bayesian Generalization Guarantees for Fairness on Stochastic and Deterministic Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classical PAC generalization bounds on the prediction risk of a classifier are insufficient to provide theoretical guarantees on fairness when the goal is to learn models balancing predictive risk and fairness constraints. We propose a PAC-Bayesian framework for deriving generalization bounds for fairness, covering both stochastic and deterministic classifiers. For stochastic classifiers, we derive a fairness bound using standard PAC-Bayes techniques. Whereas for deterministic classifiers, as usual PAC-Bayes arguments do not apply directly, we leverage a recent advance in PAC-Bayes to extend the fairness bound beyond the stochastic setting. Our framework has two advantages: (i) It applies to a broad class of fairness measures that can be expressed as a risk discrepancy, and (ii) it leads to a self-bounding algorithm in which the learning procedure directly optimizes a trade-off between generalization bounds on the prediction risk and on the fairness. We empirically evaluate our framework with three classical fairness measures, demonstrating not only its usefulness but also the tightness of our bounds.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 46 references.
References · 16
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
- 2020PAC-Bayes Analysis Beyond the Usual Boundscited by 63
- 2015Risk Bounds for the Majority Vote: From a PAC-Bayesian Analysis to a Learning Algorithmcited by 50
- 2020Second Order PAC-Bayesian Bounds for the Weighted Majority Votecited by 34
- 2023FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methodscited by 33
- 2021A General Framework for the Practical Disintegration of PAC-Bayesian Boundscited by 21
4 more
- 2021Learning Stochastic Majority Votes by Minimizing a PAC-Bayes Generalization Boundcited by 16
- 2024Leveraging PAC-Bayes Theory and Gibbs Distributions for Generalization Bounds with Complexity Measurescited by 7
- 2025Fairness Overfitting in Machine Learning: An Information-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 3
- 2025A Framework for Bounding Deterministic Risk with PAC-Bayes: Applications to Majority Votescited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.