TIP: Resisting Gradient Inversion via Targeted Interpretable Perturbation in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) facilitates collaborative model training while preserving data locality; however, the exchange of gradients renders the system vulnerable to Gradient Inversion Attacks (GIAs), allowing adversaries to reconstruct private training data with high fidelity. Existing defenses, such as Differential Privacy (DP), typically employ indiscriminate noise injection across all parameters, which severely degrades model utility and convergence stability. To address those limitation, we proposes Targeted Interpretable Perturbation (TIP), a novel defense framework that integrates model interpretability with frequency domain analysis. Unlike conventional methods that treat parameters uniformly, TIP introduces a dual-targeting strategy. First, leveraging Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to quantify channel sensitivity, we dynamically identify critical convolution channels that encode primary semantic features. Second, we transform these selected kernels into the frequency domain via the Discrete Fourier Transform and selectively inject calibrated perturbations into the high-frequency spectrum. By selectively perturbing high-frequency components, TIP effectively destroys the fine-grained details necessary for image reconstruction while preserving the low-frequency information crucial for model accuracy. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that TIP renders reconstructed images visually unrecognizable against state-of-the-art GIAs, while maintaining global model accuracy comparable to non-private baselines, significantly outperforming existing DP-based defenses in the privacy-utility trade-off and interpretability. Code is available in https://github.com/2766733506/asldkfjssdf_arxiv
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 106
4 more
- 2023GIFD: A Generative Gradient Inversion Method with Feature Domain Optimizationcited by 45
- 2024Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearningcited by 43
- 2021Bayesian Framework for Gradient Leakagecited by 34
- 2023PA-iMFL: Communication-Efficient Privacy Amplification Method against Data Reconstruction Attack in Improved Multi-Layer Federated Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.