mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sample-Free Safety Assessment of Neural Network Controllers via Taylor Methods

arXiv 2602.11332 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, artificial neural networks have been increasingly studied as feedback controllers for guidance problems. While effective in complex scenarios, they lack the verification guarantees found in classical guidance policies. Their black-box nature creates significant concerns regarding trustworthiness, limiting their adoption in safety-critical spaceflight applications. This work addresses this gap by developing a method to assess the safety of a trained neural network feedback controller via automatic domain splitting and polynomial bounding. The methodology involves embedding the trained neural network into the system's dynamical equations, rendering the closed-loop system autonomous. The system flow is then approximated by high-order Taylor polynomials, which are subsequently manipulated to construct polynomial maps that project state uncertainties onto an event manifold. Automatic domain splitting ensures the polynomials are accurate over their relevant subdomains, whilst also allowing an extensive state-space to be analysed efficiently. Utilising polynomial bounding techniques, the resulting event values may be rigorously constrained and analysed within individual subdomains, thereby establishing bounds on the range of possible closed-loop outcomes from using such neural network controllers and supporting safety assessment and informed operational decision-making in real-world missions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

9 of 38 references.

References · 9

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  4. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  5. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  6. 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
  7. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
  8. 2019Real-Time Optimal Control for Irregular Asteroid Landings Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  9. 2024Guidance and Control Networks with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.