mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepRed: an architecture for redshift estimation

arXiv 2602.11281 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026astro-ph.IM cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating redshift is a central task in astrophysics, but its measurement is costly and time-consuming. In addition, current image-based methods are often validated on homogeneous datasets. The development and comparison of networks able generalize across different morphologies, ranging from galaxies to gravitationally-lensed transients, and observational conditions, remain an open challenge. This work proposes DeepRed, a deep learning pipeline that demonstrates how modern computer vision architectures, including ResNet, EfficientNet, Swin Transformer, and MLP-Mixer, can estimate redshifts from images of galaxies, gravitational lenses, and gravitationally-lensed supernovae. We compare these architectures and their ensemble to both neural networks (A1, A3, NetZ, and PhotoZ) and a feature-based method (HOG+SVR) on simulated (DeepGraviLens) and real (KiDS, SDSS) datasets. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on all datasets. On DeepGraviLens, DeepRed achieves a significant improvement in the Normalized Mean Absolute Deviation compared to the best baseline (PhotoZ): 55% on DES-deep (using EfficientNet), 51% on DES-wide (Ensemble), 52% on DESI-DOT (Ensemble), and 46% on LSST-wide (Ensemble). On real observations from the KiDS survey, the pipeline outperforms the best baseline (NetZ), improving NMAD by 16% on a general test set without high-probability lenses (Ensemble) and 27% on high-probability lenses (Ensemble). For non-lensed galaxies in the SDSS dataset, the MLP-Mixer architecture achieves a 5% improvement over the best baselines (A3 and NetZ). SHAP shows that the models correctly focus on the objects of interest with over 95% localization accuracy on high-quality images, validating the reliability of the predictions. These findings suggest that deep learning is a scalable, robust, and interpretable solution for redshift estimation in large-scale surveys.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

13 of 90 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  8. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  9. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  10. 2018A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regressioncited by 48
  11. 2023A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIMEcited by 42
  12. 2021ExoMiner: A Highly Accurate and Explainable Deep Learning Classifier that Validates 301 New Exoplanetscited by 17
1 more
  1. 2022DeepGraviLens: a Multi-Modal Architecture for Classifying Gravitational Lensing Datacited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.