mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Automated Model Design using Gated Neuron Selection in Telecom

arXiv 2602.10854 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The telecommunications industry is experiencing rapid growth in adopting deep learning for critical tasks such as traffic prediction, signal strength prediction, and quality of service optimisation. However, designing neural network architectures for these applications remains challenging and time-consuming, particularly when targeting compact models suitable for resource-constrained network environments. Therefore, there is a need for automating the model design process to create high-performing models efficiently. This paper introduces TabGNS (Tabular Gated Neuron Selection), a novel gradient-based Neural Architecture Search (NAS) method specifically tailored for tabular data in telecommunications networks. We evaluate TabGNS across multiple telecommunications and generic tabular datasets, demonstrating improvements in prediction performance while reducing the architecture size by 51-82% and reducing the search time by up to 36x compared to state-of-the-art tabular NAS methods. Integrating TabGNS into the model lifecycle management enables automated design of neural networks throughout the lifecycle, accelerating deployment of ML solutions in telecommunications networks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,726
  2. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,056
  3. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,789
  4. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,496
  5. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 834
  6. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 733
  7. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 670
  8. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 645
  9. 2018FBNet: Hardware-Aware Efficient ConvNet Design via Differentiable Neural Architecture Searchcited by 484
  10. 2018SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Searchcited by 288
  11. 2019Searching for A Robust Neural Architecture in Four GPU Hourscited by 259
  12. 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 201
8 more
  1. 2018Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Surveycited by 118
  2. 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 109
  3. 2022Pruning-as-Search: Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Channel Pruning and Structural Reparameterizationcited by 32
  4. 2024TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 32
  5. 2020AgEBO-Tabular: Joint Neural Architecture and Hyperparameter Search with Autotuned Data-Parallel Training for Tabular Datacited by 9
  6. 2022TabNAS: Rejection Sampling for Neural Architecture Search on Tabular Datasetscited by 6
  7. 2023Fairer and More Accurate Tabular Models Through NAScited by 3
  8. 2024Multi-Task Learning as enabler for General-Purpose AI-native RANcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.