mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Automated Table Reproduction via Code Generation

arXiv 2602.10046 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.SEcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reproducibility is an important goal in computer science research, e.g., for artifact evaluation and to build upon experimental results of prior work. Recently, LLM agents are being used to automatically reproduce research results, but they fail to provide executable evidence of reproduction and do not consider the method of reproduction, which limits their usefulness. We present Artisan, an LLM agent that reproduces tables of numeric results, given a paper and its artifact. The approach is enabled by two key contributions: First, we frame the reproduction problem as a code generation task, enabling users to audit and re-run the resulting reproduction script independently of the agent. Second, we design automated judging mechanisms that steer the agent toward correct results without exposing them, while preventing shortcuts like copying precomputed results. To evaluate Artisan, we introduce Artisan-Bench, the first benchmark assessing the ability to generate code that reproduces research results. Artisan-Bench comprises 60 tasks derived from 23 software engineering papers. Our experiments show that Artisan is effective and efficient, with the added benefit of aiding the discovery of 20 new errors in either the paper or artifact.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation
  2. 2026ReproRepo: Scaling Reproducibility Audits with GitHub Repository Issues
  3. 2026SA-Bench: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in LLM-Based Paper Reproduction
  4. 2026Automating Computational Reproducibility in Social Science: Comparing Prompt-Based and Agent-Based Approaches
  5. 2026An Agentic Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Scientific Code in PETSc
  6. 2026Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers
  7. 2026Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?
  8. 2026ToolRosella: Translating Code Repositories into Standardized Tools for Scientific Agents