Infusion: Shaping Model Behavior by Editing Training Data via Influence Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Influence functions are commonly used to attribute model behavior to training documents. We explore the reverse: crafting training data that induces model behavior. Our framework, Infusion, uses scalable influence-function approximations to compute small perturbations to training documents that induce targeted changes in model behavior through parameter shifts. We evaluate Infusion on data poisoning tasks across vision and language domains. On CIFAR-10, we show that making subtle edits via Infusion to just 0.2% (100/45,000) of the training documents can be competitive with the baseline of inserting a small number of explicit behavior examples. We also find that Infusion transfers across architectures (ResNet leftrightarrow CNN), suggesting a single poisoned corpus can affect multiple independently trained models. In preliminary language experiments, we characterize when our approach increases the probability of target behaviors and when it fails, finding it most effective at amplifying behaviors the model has already learned. Taken together, these results show that small, subtle edits to training data can systematically shape model behavior, underscoring the importance of training data interpretability for adversaries and defenders alike. We provide the code here: https://github.com/jrosseruk/infusion.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 46 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
- 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 359
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
- 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 188
20 more
- 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 171
- 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
- 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 153
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
- 2020MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data Poisoningcited by 114
- 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
- 2024Attacking Large Language Models with Projected Gradient Descentcited by 91
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 89
- 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 66
- 2020Bullseye Polytope: A Scalable Clean-Label Poisoning Attack with Improved Transferabilitycited by 65
- 2020Influence Function based Data Poisoning Attacks to Top-N Recommender Systemscited by 61
- 2024Persistent Pre-Training Poisoning of LLMscited by 46
- 2024Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining Drives Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 41
- 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiationcited by 33
- 2025Optimizing ML Training with Metagradient Descentcited by 22
- 2025MAGIC: Near-Optimal Data Attribution for Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2024Delta-Influence: Unlearning Poisons via Influence Functionscited by 12
- 2026Patterning: The Dual of Interpretabilitycited by 6
- 2025Subliminal Corruption: Mechanisms, Thresholds, and Interpretabilitycited by 4
- 2024GAIM: Attacking Graph Neural Networks via Adversarial Influence Maximizationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Synthetic Data for any Differentiable Targetcited by 2
- 2026Detecting Contaminated Code-Generation Prompt Batches via Influence Functionscited by 0
- 2026Patterning in Practice: Debiasing Reward Models with Susceptibilitiescited by 0
- 2026From Reweighting to Rewriting: Unlocking the Intervention Effects of Influential Samples in Training Data Attributioncited by 0
- 2026From Reweighting to Rewriting: Unlocking the Intervention Effects of Influential Samples in Training Data Attribution2 Sep 2026
- 2026Patterning in Practice: Debiasing Reward Models with Susceptibilities1 Sep 2026
- 2026Detecting Contaminated Code-Generation Prompt Batches via Influence Functions14 Aug 2026
- 2026Synthetic Data for any Differentiable Target9 Apr 2026