Learning to Detect Baked Goods with Limited Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Monitoring leftover products provides valuable insights that can be used to optimize future production. This is especially important for German bakeries because freshly baked goods have a very short shelf life. Automating this process can reduce labor costs, improve accuracy, and streamline operations. We propose automating this process using an object detection model to identify baked goods from images. However, the large diversity of German baked goods makes fully supervised training prohibitively expensive and limits scalability. Although open-vocabulary detectors (e.g., OWLv2, Grounding DINO) offer lexibility, we demonstrate that they are insufficient for our task. While motivated by bakeries, our work addresses the broader challenges of deploying computer vision in industries, where tasks are specialized and annotated datasets are scarce. We compile dataset splits with varying supervision levels, covering 19 classes of baked goods. We propose two training workflows to train an object detection model with limited supervision. First, we combine OWLv2 and Grounding DINO localization with image-level supervision to train the model in a weakly supervised manner. Second, we improve viewpoint robustness by fine-tuning on video frames annotated using Segment Anything 2 as a pseudo-label propagation model. Using these workflows, we train YOLOv11 for our detection task due to its favorable speed accuracy tradeoff. Relying solely on image-level supervision, the model achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.91. Finetuning with pseudo-labels raises model performance by 19.3% under non-ideal deployment conditions. Combining these workflows trains a model that surpasses our fully-supervised baseline model under non-ideal deployment conditions, despite relying only on image-level supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 23 references.
References · 10
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,217
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
- 2020Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentationcited by 596
- 2024YOLO-World: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 503
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
- 2023Scaling Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 343
- 2024Semmeldetector: Application of Machine Learning in Commercial Bakeriescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.