mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Autonomous Action Runtime Management(AARM):A System Specification for Securing AI-Driven Actions at Runtime

arXiv 2602.09433 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence systems evolve from passive assistants into autonomous agents capable of executing consequential actions, the security boundary shifts from model outputs to tool execution. Traditional security paradigms - log aggregation, perimeter defense, and post-hoc forensics - cannot protect systems where AI-driven actions are irreversible, execute at machine speed, and originate from potentially compromised orchestration layers. This paper introduces Autonomous Action Runtime Management (AARM), an open specification for securing AI-driven actions at runtime. AARM defines a runtime security system that intercepts actions before execution, accumulates session context, evaluates against policy and intent alignment, enforces authorization decisions, and records tamper-evident receipts for forensic reconstruction. We formalize a threat model addressing prompt injection, confused deputy attacks, data exfiltration, and intent drift. We introduce an action classification framework distinguishing forbidden, context-dependent deny, and context-dependent allow actions. We propose four implementation architectures - protocol gateway, SDK instrumentation, kernel eBPF, and vendor integration - with distinct trust properties, and specify minimum conformance requirements for AARM-compliant systems. AARM is model-agnostic, framework-agnostic, and vendor-neutral, treating action execution as the stable security boundary. This specification aims to establish industry-wide requirements before proprietary fragmentation forecloses interoperability.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 41 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  4. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  5. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  6. 2024Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interactioncited by 167
  7. 2024The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Surveycited by 164
  8. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agentscited by 129
  9. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studiescited by 127
  10. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilitiescited by 125
  11. 2025TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systemscited by 58
  12. 2021The Flaws of Policies Requiring Human Oversight of Government Algorithmscited by 44
3 more
  1. 2025A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agentscited by 28
  2. 2024Security of AI Agentscited by 24
  3. 2025Systematization of Knowledge: Security and Safety in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystemcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.