mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CIC-Trap4Phish: A Unified Multi-Format Dataset for Phishing and Quishing Attachment Detection

arXiv 2602.09015 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Phishing attacks represents one of the primary attack methods which is used by cyber attackers. In many cases, attackers use deceptive emails along with malicious attachments to trick users into giving away sensitive information or installing malware while compromising entire systems. The flexibility of malicious email attachments makes them stand out as a preferred vector for attackers as they can embed harmful content such as malware or malicious URLs inside standard document formats. Although phishing email defenses have improved a lot, attackers continue to abuse attachments, enabling malicious content to bypass security measures. Moreover, another challenge that researches face in training advance models, is lack of an unified and comprehensive dataset that covers the most prevalent data types. To address this gap, we generated CIC-Trap4Phish, a multi-format dataset containing both malicious and benign samples across five categories commonly used in phishing campaigns: Microsoft Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, PDF files, HTML pages, and QR code images. For the first four file types, a set of execution-free static feature pipeline was proposed, designed to capture structural, lexical, and metadata-based indicators without the need to open or execute files. Feature selection was performed using a combination of SHAP analysis and feature importance, yielding compact, discriminative feature subsets for each file type. The selected features were evaluated by using lightweight machine learning models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and Decision Tree. All models demonstrate high detection accuracy across formats. For QR code-based phishing (quishing), two complementary methods were implemented: image-based detection by employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and lexical analysis of decoded URLs using recent lightweight language models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

8 of 38 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  2. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  3. 2025EMBER2024 -- A Benchmark Dataset for Holistic Evaluation of Malware Classifierscited by 19
  4. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
  5. 2025Detecting Quishing Attacks with Machine Learning Techniques Through QR Code Analysiscited by 3
  6. 2025Analyzing PDFs like Binaries: Adversarially Robust PDF Malware Analysis via Intermediate Representation and Language Modelcited by 2
  7. 2025PhreshPhish: A Real-World, High-Quality, Large-Scale Phishing Website Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 2
  8. 2021Analysis and Correlation of Visual Evidence in Campaigns of Malicious Office Documentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GuardPhish: Securing Open-Source LLMs from Phishing Abuse
  2. 2026Explainable Machine Learning for Phishing Detection on Heterogeneous Datasets with MCP-Enabled Deployment ↗
  3. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Phishing Detection, Self-Consistency, Faithfulness, and Explainability
  4. 2025Can MLLMs Detect Phishing? A Comprehensive Security Benchmark Suite Focusing on Dynamic Threats and Multimodal Evaluation in Academic Environments
  5. 2025Phishing Email Detection Using Large Language Models
  6. 2026User-Centric Phishing Detection: A RAG and LLM-Based Approach ↗
  7. 2026Prompt Injection Detection for Email Agents Through Attack Chain Modeling
  8. 2025PhishIntentionLLM: Uncovering Phishing Website Intentions through Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation