mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Explainable Multi-Task Similarity Measure: Integrating Accumulated Local Effects and Weighted Fr'echet Distance

arXiv 2602.07966 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many machine learning contexts, tasks are often treated as interconnected components with the goal of leveraging knowledge transfer between them, which is the central aim of Multi-Task Learning (MTL). Consequently, this multi-task scenario requires addressing critical questions: which tasks are similar, and how and why do they exhibit similarity? In this work, we propose a multi-task similarity measure based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, specifically Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) curves. ALE curves are compared using the Fr'echet distance, weighted by the data distribution, and the resulting similarity measure incorporates the importance of each feature. The measure is applicable in both single-task learning scenarios, where each task is trained separately, and multi-task learning scenarios, where all tasks are learned simultaneously. The measure is model-agnostic, allowing the use of different machine learning models across tasks. A scaling factor is introduced to account for differences in predictive performance across tasks, and several recommendations are provided for applying the measure in complex scenarios. We validate this measure using four datasets, one synthetic dataset and three real-world datasets. The real-world datasets include a well-known Parkinson's dataset and a bike-sharing usage dataset -- both structured in tabular format -- as well as the CelebA dataset, which is used to evaluate the application of concept bottleneck encoders in a multitask learning setting. The results demonstrate that the measure aligns with intuitive expectations of task similarity across both tabular and non-tabular data, making it a valuable tool for exploring relationships between tasks and supporting informed decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  5. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  6. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 627
  7. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
  8. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  9. 2022Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Researchcited by 25
  10. 2022Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Improved Modeling of Processescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.