SparseEval: Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models by Sparse Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) continue to scale up, their performance on various downstream tasks has significantly improved. However, evaluating their capabilities has become increasingly expensive, as performing inference on a large number of benchmark samples incurs high computational costs. In this paper, we revisit the model-item performance matrix and show that it exhibits sparsity, that representative items can be selected as anchors, and that the task of efficient benchmarking can be formulated as a sparse optimization problem. Based on these insights, we propose SparseEval, a method that, for the first time, adopts gradient descent to optimize anchor weights and employs an iterative refinement strategy for anchor selection. We utilize the representation capacity of MLP to handle sparse optimization and propose the Anchor Importance Score and Candidate Importance Score to evaluate the value of each item for task-aware refinement. Extensive experiments demonstrate the low estimation error and high Kendall's~τ of our method across a variety of benchmarks, showcasing its superior robustness and practicality in real-world scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/taolinzhang/SparseEval.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.
Builds on
18 of 22 references.
References · 18
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
6 more
- 2025LIMR: Less is More for RL Scalingcited by 136
- 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
- 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
- 2024100 instances is all you need: predicting the success of a new LLM on unseen data by testing on a few instancescited by 24
- 2025Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Tailored Benchmarks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 11
- 2025EffiEval: Efficient and Generalizable Model Evaluation via Capability Coverage Maximizationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026MINCE: Shrinking LLM Evaluation Datasets via Few-Model Monte Carlo Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Zipbench: Low-Cost Framework for Compressing Comprehensive Benchmarks of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarkingcited by 0
- 2026Hierarchical Compression of Vision-Language Model Benchmarkscited by 0
- 2026cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agentscited by 0
- 2026cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026Hierarchical Compression of Vision-Language Model Benchmarks29 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking16 Sep 2026
- 2026Zipbench: Low-Cost Framework for Compressing Comprehensive Benchmarks of Large Language Models11 Sep 2026
- 2026PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation2 Jul 2026
- 2026MINCE: Shrinking LLM Evaluation Datasets via Few-Model Monte Carlo Calibration22 Jun 2026