Gaussian Match-and-Copy: A Minimalist Benchmark for Studying Transformer Induction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Match-and-copy is a core retrieval primitive used at inference time by large language models to retrieve a matching token from the context then copy its successor. Yet, understanding how this behavior emerges on natural data is challenging because retrieval and memorization are entangled. To disentangle the two, we introduce Gaussian Match-and-Copy (GMC), a minimalist benchmark that isolates long-range retrieval through pure second-order correlation signals. Numerical investigations show that this task retains key qualitative aspects of how Transformers develop match-and-copy circuits in practice, and separates architectures by their retrieval capabilities. We also analyze the optimization dynamics in a simplified attention setting. Although many solutions are a priori possible under a regression objective, including ones that do not implement retrieval, we identify an implicit-bias regime in which gradient descent drives the parameters to diverge while their direction aligns with the max-margin separator, yielding hard match selection. We prove this max-margin alignment for GD trajectories that reach vanishing empirical loss under explicit technical conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
39 of 48 references.
References · 39
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 714
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
- 2022Hungry Hungry Hippos: Towards Language Modeling with State Space Modelscited by 495
27 more
- 2023Hyena Hierarchy: Towards Larger Convolutional Language Modelscited by 388
- 2022Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformerscited by 303
- 2024Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copyingcited by 208
- 2023Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Modelscited by 188
- 2016Using Fast Weights to Attend to the Recent Pastcited by 161
- 2023Birth of a Transformer: A Memory Viewpointcited by 154
- 2023The mechanistic basis of data dependence and abrupt learning in an in-context classification taskcited by 115
- 2024The Evolution of Statistical Induction Heads: In-Context Learning Markov Chainscited by 115
- 2024How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descentcited by 114
- 2024In-Context Language Learning: Architectures and Algorithmscited by 86
- 2024What needs to go right for an induction head? A mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formationcited by 86
- 2023The Transient Nature of Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformerscited by 72
- 2022Formal Algorithms for Transformerscited by 70
- 2023Transformers as Support Vector Machinescited by 67
- 2024Mamba-360: Survey of State Space Models as Transformer Alternative for Long Sequence Modelling: Methods, Applications, and Challengescited by 63
- 2023Understanding In-Context Learning in Transformers and LLMs by Learning to Learn Discrete Functionscited by 62
- 2023Max-Margin Token Selection in Attention Mechanismcited by 57
- 2024Induction Heads as an Essential Mechanism for Pattern Matching in In-context Learningcited by 46
- 2024Unveiling Induction Heads: Provable Training Dynamics and Feature Learning in Transformerscited by 46
- 2024Implicit Bias and Fast Convergence Rates for Self-attentioncited by 31
- 2024One-layer transformers fail to solve the induction heads taskcited by 30
- 2024Transformers on Markov Data: Constant Depth Sufficescited by 26
- 2023Is attention required for ICL? Exploring the Relationship Between Model Architecture and In-Context Learning Abilitycited by 16
- 2024Attention layers provably solve single-location regressioncited by 15
- 2025Learning In-context n-grams with Transformers: Sub-n-grams Are Near-stationary Pointscited by 15
- 2024How Transformers Get Rich: Approximation and Dynamics Analysiscited by 7
- 2025On the Emergence of Induction Heads for In-Context Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.