Patch-to-PoC: A Systematic Study of Agentic LLM Systems for Linux Kernel N-Day Reproduction
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous large language model (LLM) based systems have recently shown promising results across a range of cybersecurity tasks. However, there is no systematic study on their effectiveness in autonomously reproducing Linux kernel vulnerabilities with concrete proofs-of-concept (PoCs). Owing to the size, complexity, and low-level nature of the Linux kernel, such tasks are widely regarded as particularly challenging for current LLM-based approaches. In this paper, we present the first large-scale study of LLM-based Linux kernel vulnerability reproduction. For this purpose, we develop K-Repro, an LLM-based agentic system equipped with controlled code-browsing, virtual machine management, interaction, and debugging capabilities. Using kernel security patches as input, K-Repro automates end-to-end bug reproduction of N-day vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. On a dataset of 100 real-world exploitable Linux kernel vulnerabilities collected from KernelCTF, our results show that K-Repro can generate PoCs that reproduce over 50% of the cases with practical time and monetary cost. Beyond aggregate success rates, we perform an extensive study of effectiveness, efficiency, stability, and impact factors to explain when agentic reproduction succeeds, where it fails, and which components drive performance. These findings provide actionable guidance for building more reliable autonomous security agents and for assessing real-world N-day risk from both offensive and defensive perspectives.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
14 of 63 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025PBFuzz: Agentic Directed Fuzzing for PoV Generation4 Dec
- 2025AutoPentester: An LLM Agent-based Framework for Automated Pentesting7 Oct
- 2025From CVE Entries to Verifiable Exploits: An Automated Multi-Agent Framework for Reproducing CVEs1 Sep
- 2025FaultLine: Automated Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation Using LLM Agents21 Jul
Other references · 10
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 225
- 2025PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packagescited by 12
- 2025ATLANTIS: AI-driven Threat Localization, Analysis, and Triage Intelligence Systemcited by 9
- 2025All You Need Is A Fuzzing Brain: An LLM-Powered System for Automated Vulnerability Detection and Patchingcited by 6
- 2024An Investigation of Patch Porting Practices of the Linux Kernel Ecosystemcited by 5
- 2021SyzScope: Revealing High-Risk Security Impacts of Fuzzer-Exposed Bugs in Linux kernelcited by 4
- 2025Your Fix Is My Exploit: Enabling Comprehensive DL Library API Fuzzing with Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024ProphetFuzz: Fully Automated Prediction and Fuzzing of High-Risk Option Combinations with Only Documentation via Large Language Modelcited by 2
- 2023Top of the Heap: Efficient Memory Error Protection of Safe Heap Objectscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agentscited by 16
- 2026SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?cited by 8
- 2026PoC-Adapt: Semantic-Aware Automated Vulnerability Reproduction with LLM Multi-Agents and Reinforcement Learning-Driven Adaptive Policycited by 1
- 2026The Next Challenge for Agentic Cybersecurity: A Realistic, Contamination-Free Reverse Engineering Benchmarkcited by 1
- 2026Benchmarking Automated Security Patch Backporting: How Far Are We?cited by 0
- 2026PrimSynth: An Agentic Approach to Discover, Validate, and Synthesize Exploit Primitives for Linux Kernel Vulnerabilitiescited by 0
- 2026The History Is the Detector: Executing CVE Patch History, End-to-Endcited by 0
- 2026The History Is the Detector: Executing CVE Patch History, End-to-End4 Sep 2026
- 2026PrimSynth: An Agentic Approach to Discover, Validate, and Synthesize Exploit Primitives for Linux Kernel Vulnerabilities2 Sep 2026
- 2026Benchmarking Automated Security Patch Backporting: How Far Are We?18 Aug 2026
- 2026The Next Challenge for Agentic Cybersecurity: A Realistic, Contamination-Free Reverse Engineering Benchmark11 Aug 2026
- 2026SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?26 May 2026
- 2026ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents13 May 2026
- 2026PoC-Adapt: Semantic-Aware Automated Vulnerability Reproduction with LLM Multi-Agents and Reinforcement Learning-Driven Adaptive Policy8 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PrivEscalate: Measuring and Augmenting the Threat of LLM-Automated Linux Privilege Escalation ↗
- 2026Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents
- 2026SyzHarness: Patch-Based Kernel Bug Reproduction with LLM-Synthesized Fuzzing Harnesses
- 2026ZeroDayBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Unseen Zero-Day Vulnerabilities for Cyberdefense
- 2026Outrunning LLM Cutoffs: A Live Kernel Crash Resolution Benchmark for All
- 2025From LLMs to Agents: A Comparative Evaluation of LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Security Patch Detection
- 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
- 2026Patch2Vuln: Agentic Reconstruction of Vulnerabilities from Linux Distribution Binary Patches