BONSAI: Bayesian Optimization with Natural Simplicity and Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular technique for sample-efficient optimization of black-box functions. In many applications, the parameters being tuned come with a carefully engineered default configuration, and practitioners only want to deviate from this default when necessary. Standard BO, however, does not aim to minimize deviation from the default and, in practice, often pushes weakly relevant parameters to the boundary of the search space. This makes it difficult to distinguish between important and spurious changes and increases the burden of vetting recommendations when the optimization objective omits relevant operational considerations. We introduce BONSAI, a default-aware BO policy that prunes low-impact deviations from a default configuration while explicitly controlling the loss in acquisition value. BONSAI is compatible with a variety of acquisition functions, including expected improvement and upper confidence bound (GP-UCB). We theoretically bound the regret incurred by BONSAI, showing that, under appropriate conditions, it retains the no-regret property of vanilla GP-UCB and removes irrelevant changes. Across many real-world applications, we empirically find that BONSAI substantially reduces the number of non-default parameters in recommended configurations while maintaining competitive optimization performance with little effect on wall time. Its candidate-generation cost averages only 1.5× that of standard BO, compared with 7-34× for prior sparse-BO methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
- 2020Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 176
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
- 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 144
- 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspacescited by 139
- 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 137
- 2021Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Multiple Noisy Objectives with Expected Hypervolume Improvementcited by 115
- 2021Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization over High-Dimensional Search Spacescited by 87
- 2024Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensionscited by 87
- 2022πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 69
- 2020Random Hypervolume Scalarizations for Provable Multi-Objective Black Box Optimizationcited by 60
- 2016Conservative Contextual Linear Banditscited by 56
11 more
- 2021LassoBench: A High-Dimensional Hyperparameter Optimization Benchmark Suite for Lassocited by 41
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search based Variable Selection for High Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 37
- 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 27
- 2020Optimizing Coverage and Capacity in Cellular Networks using Machine Learningcited by 21
- 2021Computationally Efficient High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Variable Selectioncited by 12
- 2024Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 8
- 2022Sparse Bayesian Optimizationcited by 6
- 2020Bayesian optimization for modular black-box systems with switching costscited by 5
- 2025Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?cited by 4
- 2025Experimenting, Fast and Slow: Bayesian Optimization of Long-term Outcomes with Online Experimentscited by 2
- 2025Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.