Concept-Aware Privacy Mechanisms for Defending Embedding Inversion Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text embeddings enable numerous NLP applications but face severe privacy risks from embedding inversion attacks, which can expose sensitive attributes or reconstruct raw text. Existing differential privacy defenses assume uniform sensitivity across embedding dimensions, leading to excessive noise and degraded utility. We propose SPARSE, a user-centric framework for concept-specific privacy protection in text embeddings. SPARSE combines (1) differentiable mask learning to identify privacy-sensitive dimensions for user-defined concepts, and (2) the Mahalanobis mechanism that applies elliptical noise calibrated by dimension sensitivity. Unlike traditional spherical noise injection, SPARSE selectively perturbs privacy-sensitive dimensions while preserving non-sensitive semantics. Evaluated across six datasets with three embedding models and attack scenarios, SPARSE consistently reduces privacy leakage while achieving superior downstream performance compared to state-of-the-art DP methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 40 references.
References · 21
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
- 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
- 2020Information Leakage in Embedding Modelscited by 199
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 194
9 more
- 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 189
- 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 115
- 2023Sentence Embedding Leaks More Information than You Expect: Generative Embedding Inversion Attack to Recover the Whole Sentencecited by 81
- 2020Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairnesscited by 66
- 2018Privacy-preserving Neural Representations of Textcited by 54
- 2019Leveraging Hierarchical Representations for Preserving Privacy and Utility in Textcited by 49
- 2020Towards Differentially Private Text Representationscited by 28
- 2024Transferable Embedding Inversion Attack: Uncovering Privacy Risks in Text Embeddings without Model Queriescited by 25
- 2022How to keep text private? A systematic review of deep learning methods for privacy-preserving natural language processingcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.