mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ARGOS: Automated Functional Safety Requirement Synthesis for Embodied AI via Attribute-Guided Combinatorial Reasoning

arXiv 2602.07007 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring functional safety is essential for the deployment of Embodied AI in complex open-world environments. However, traditional Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) methods struggle to scale in this domain. While HARA relies on enumerating risks for finite and pre-defined function lists, Embodied AI operates on open-ended natural language instructions, creating a challenge of combinatorial interaction risks. Whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising solution to this scalability challenge, they often lack physical grounding, yielding semantically superficial and incoherent hazard descriptions. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new framework ARGOS (AttRibute-Guided cOmbinatorial reaSoning), which bridges the gap between open-ended user instructions and concrete physical attributes. By dynamically decomposing entities from instructions into these fine-grained properties, ARGOS grounds LLM reasoning in causal risk factors to generate physically plausible hazard scenarios. It then instantiates abstract safety standards, such as ISO 13482, into context-specific Functional Safety Requirements (FSRs) by integrating these scenarios with robot capabilities. Extensive experiments validate that ARGOS produces high-quality FSRs and outperforms baselines in identifying long-tail risks. Overall, this work paves the way for systematic and grounded functional safety requirement generation, a critical step toward the safe industrial deployment of Embodied AI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

0 of 26 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SafeMind: Benchmarking and Mitigating Safety Risks in Embodied LLM Agents
  2. 2026SafetyALFRED: Evaluating Safety-Conscious Planning of Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2025RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic
  4. 2026EMBGuard: Constructing Hazard-Aware Guardrails for Safe Planning in Embodied Agents
  5. 2025A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents
  6. 2025SENTINEL: A Multi-Level Formal Framework for Safety Evaluation of Foundation Model-based Embodied Agents
  7. 2026Using large language models for embodied planning introduces systematic safety risks
  8. 2024SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents