mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sequential Auditing for f-Differential Privacy

arXiv 2602.06518 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2026cs.CR stat.ME stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present new auditors to assess Differential Privacy (DP) of an algorithm based on output samples. Such empirical auditors are common to check for algorithmic correctness and implementation bugs. Most existing auditors are batch-based or targeted toward the traditional notion of (varepsilon,δ)-DP; typically both. In this work, we shift the focus to the highly expressive privacy concept of f-DP, in which the entire privacy behavior is captured by a single tradeoff curve. Our auditors detect violations across the full privacy spectrum with statistical significance guarantees, which are supported by theory and simulations. Most importantly, and in contrast to prior work, our auditors do not require a user-specified sample size as an input. Rather, they adaptively determine a near-optimal number of samples needed to reach a decision, thereby avoiding the excessively large sample sizes common in many auditing studies. This reduction in sampling cost becomes especially beneficial for expensive training procedures such as DP-SGD. Our method supports both whitebox and blackbox settings and can also be executed in one-run frameworks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  3. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  4. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
  5. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  6. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
  7. 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 229
  8. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
  9. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
  10. 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 123
  11. 2022Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance Systemcited by 44
  12. 2020A Primer on Private Statisticscited by 30
9 more
  1. 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Runcited by 30
  2. 2023Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deploymentcited by 27
  3. 2022PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processingcited by 19
  4. 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
  5. 2020CheckDP: An Automated and Integrated Approach for Proving Differential Privacy or Finding Precise Counterexamplescited by 7
  6. 2025Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacycited by 5
  7. 2025General-Purpose f-DP Estimation and Auditing in a Black-Box Settingcited by 4
  8. 2022Lower Bounds for R'enyi Differential Privacy in a Black-Box Settingcited by 2
  9. 2023Optimizing Noise for f-Differential Privacy via Anti-Concentration and Stochastic Dominancecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.