mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do It for HER: First-Order Temporal Logic Reward Specification in Reinforcement Learning (Extended Version)

arXiv 2602.06227 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we propose a novel framework for the logical specification of non-Markovian rewards in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with large state spaces. Our approach leverages Linear Temporal Logic Modulo Theories over finite traces (LTLfMT), a more expressive extension of classical temporal logic in which predicates are first-order formulas of arbitrary first-order theories rather than simple Boolean variables. This enhanced expressiveness enables the specification of complex tasks over unstructured and heterogeneous data domains, promoting a unified and reusable framework that eliminates the need for manual predicate encoding. However, the increased expressive power of LTLfMT introduces additional theoretical and computational challenges compared to standard LTLf specifications. We address these challenges from a theoretical standpoint, identifying a fragment of LTLfMT that is tractable but sufficiently expressive for reward specification in an infinite-state-space context. From a practical perspective, we introduce a method based on reward machines and Hindsight Experience Replay (HER) to translate first-order logic specifications and address reward sparsity. We evaluate this approach to a continuous-control setting using Non-Linear Arithmetic Theory, showing that it enables natural specification of complex tasks. Experimental results show how a tailored implementation of HER is fundamental in solving tasks with complex goals.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

19 of 51 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  2. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  3. 2020Reward Machines: Exploiting Reward Function Structure in Reinforcement Learningcited by 183
  4. 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 114
  5. 2019Control Synthesis from Linear Temporal Logic Specifications using Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 74
  6. 2018Foundations for Restraining Bolts: Reinforcement Learning with LTLf/LDLf restraining specificationscited by 69
  7. 2020A Composable Specification Language for Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 68
  8. 2021Modular Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Motion Planning with Temporal Logiccited by 38
  9. 2019Certified Reinforcement Learning with Logic Guidancecited by 35
  10. 2020Temporal-Logic-Based Reward Shaping for Continuing Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 28
  11. 2021The Logical Options Frameworkcited by 24
  12. 2024Shield Synthesis for LTL Modulo Theoriescited by 12
7 more
  1. 2024Reward Machines for Deep RL in Noisy and Uncertain Environmentscited by 11
  2. 2023Boolean Abstractions for Realizability Modulo Theories (Extended version)cited by 9
  3. 2022Linear Temporal Logic Modulo Theories over Finite Traces (Extended Version)cited by 8
  4. 2019First-Order vs. Second-Order Encodings for LTLf-to-Automata Translationcited by 5
  5. 2023Decidable Fragments of LTLf Modulo Theories (Extended Version)cited by 5
  6. 2023Linear-Time Verification of Data-Aware Processes Modulo Theories via Covers and Automata (Extended Version)cited by 2
  7. 2024A Unified Automata-Theoretic Approach to LTLf Modulo Theories (Extended Version)cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.