mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tuning Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detectors Without Given OOD Data

arXiv 2602.05935 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors are often tuned by a separate dataset deemed OOD with respect to the training distribution of a neural network (NN). OOD detectors process the activations of NN layers and score the output, where parameters of the detectors are determined by fitting to an in-distribution (training) set and the aforementioned dataset chosen adhocly. At detector training time, this adhoc dataset may not be available or difficult to obtain, and even when it's available, it may not be representative of actual OOD data, which is often ''unknown unknowns." Current benchmarks may specify some left-out set from test OOD sets. We show that there can be significant variance in performance of detectors based on the adhoc dataset chosen in current literature, and thus even if such a dataset can be collected, the performance of the detector may be highly dependent on the choice. In this paper, we introduce and formalize the often neglected problem of tuning OOD detectors without a given ``OOD'' dataset. To this end, we present strong baselines as an attempt to approach this problem. Furthermore, we propose a new generic approach to OOD detector tuning that does not require any extra data other than those used to train the NN. We show that our approach improves over baseline methods consistently across higher-parameter OOD detector families, while being comparable across lower-parameter families.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  5. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  6. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  8. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  9. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  10. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  11. 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
  12. 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 243
9 more
  1. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
  2. 2022Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 212
  3. 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
  4. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
  5. 2023Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networkscited by 67
  6. 2021On Out-of-distribution Detection with Energy-based Modelscited by 17
  7. 2023VRA: Variational Rectified Activation for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 15
  8. 2024Towards Optimal Feature-Shaping Methods for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 13
  9. 2025An Information-Theoretic Framework for Feature Construction in Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.