mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LeakBoost: Perceptual-Loss-Based Membership Inference Attack

arXiv 2602.05748 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether a sample was part of a model's training set, posing serious privacy risks for modern machine-learning systems. Existing MIAs primarily rely on static indicators, such as loss or confidence, and do not fully leverage the dynamic behavior of models when actively probed. We propose LeakBoost, a perceptual-loss-based interrogation framework that actively probes a model's internal representations to expose hidden membership signals. Given a candidate input, LeakBoost synthesizes an interrogation image by optimizing a perceptual (activation-space) objective, amplifying representational differences between members and non-members. This image is then analyzed by an off-the-shelf membership detector, without modifying the detector itself. When combined with existing membership inference methods, LeakBoost achieves substantial improvements at low false-positive rates across multiple image classification datasets and diverse neural network architectures. In particular, it raises AUC from near-chance levels (0.53-0.62) to 0.81-0.88, and increases TPR at 1 percent FPR by over an order of magnitude compared to strong baseline attacks. A detailed sensitivity analysis reveals that deeper layers and short, low-learning-rate optimization produce the strongest leakage, and that improvements concentrate in gradient-based detectors. LeakBoost thus offers a modular and computationally efficient way to assess privacy risks in white-box settings, advancing the study of dynamic membership inference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled Adversarial Queries19 Oct
  2. 2022Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss Trajectory31 Aug
  3. 2022Membership Inference Attack Using Self Influence Functions26 May
  4. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec

Other references · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  9. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  10. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  11. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  12. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
5 more
  1. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  2. 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
  3. 2021On the geometry of generalization and memorization in deep neural networkscited by 71
  4. 2022Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information Leakagecited by 16
  5. 2023Investigating the Effect of Misalignment on Membership Privacy in the White-box Settingcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.