Broken neural scaling laws in materials science
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In materials science, data are scarce and expensive to generate, whether computationally or experimentally. Therefore, it is crucial to identify how model performance scales with dataset size and model capacity to distinguish between data- and model-limited regimes. Neural scaling laws provide a framework for quantifying this behavior and guide the design of materials datasets and machine learning architectures. Here, we investigate neural scaling laws for a paradigmatic materials science task: predicting the dielectric function of metals, a high-dimensional response that governs how solids interact with light. Using over 200,000 dielectric functions from high-throughput ab initio calculations, we study two multi-objective graph neural networks trained to predict the frequency-dependent complex interband dielectric function and the Drude frequency. We observe broken neural scaling laws with respect to dataset size, whereas scaling with the number of model parameters follows a simple power law that rapidly saturates.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.
Builds on
26 of 117 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
- 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
- 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 556
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2015Order Matters: Sequence to sequence for setscited by 236
- 2019Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objectscited by 202
14 more
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
- 2023Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator: Understanding Its Algorithm Components and Their Roles for Better Empirical Performancecited by 143
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 105
- 2022Broken Neural Scaling Lawscited by 102
- 2018Attention-based Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 100
- 2022The Design Space of E(3)-Equivariant Atom-Centered Interatomic Potentialscited by 100
- 2025UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atomscited by 99
- 2025Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Predictioncited by 79
- 2024The Importance of Being Scalable: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Neural Network Interatomic Potentials Across Chemical Domainscited by 40
- 2025PET-MAD, a lightweight universal interatomic potential for advanced materials modelingcited by 23
- 2025Scaling Laws of Graph Neural Networks for Atomistic Materials Modelingcited by 4
- 2025Discovery of sustainable energy materials via the machine-learned material spacecited by 1
- 2025The carbon cost of materials discovery: Can machine learning really accelerate the discovery of new photovoltaics?cited by 1
- 2025Scaling Laws for Neural Material Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.